 | | Re: OMR Newsgroups for submission?
|
|
(...) Enh...you're probably right. But we could at least have .system and .technic to separate those?? (...) Ok, so what do you think about the group thing? I think its a good idea and would be a nice place to cumulate models of such type. It is (...) (25 years ago, 15-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Storage and Display of OMR Files
|
|
(...) Nah, why go through all that work? -- just embed the directory name into the zipfile. I'm a bit rusty on pkzip (I use tar these days) but essentially: pkzip xxxxz-yy.zip sets\xxxxz-yy\*.* which is analagous to tar -cvf xxxxz-yy.tar (...) (25 years ago, 15-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: OMR Newsgroups for submission?
|
|
(...) Why would there need to be more than 1 group? (...) yup! --Todd (...) (25 years ago, 15-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | OMR Newsgroups for submission?
|
|
It appears that discussion on the OMR has died down a bit. Since I've received mails from a few people who want to submit to the OMR, I think its time to make a decision on this. We did entertain the thought of having newsgroups which handle dat (...) (25 years ago, 15-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: 6246f: Minifig Oilcan
|
|
(...) Maybe just MinifigTool, MinifigAccessory, MinifigWeapon? (...) That's the rub. If there were a makelist which sorted on category, then we could use more logical partnames, and put our goofy category/sorting language in a 0 Category statement. (...) (25 years ago, 15-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
