 | | Re: LDAO Suggestion Mark 2
|
|
Steve Bliss wrote in message <37714eef.19012626@l...et.com>... (...) and (...) Ship1.dat (...) Unless you use name mangling... Why don't we just use real dirs, anyway. I'm sure ldlite, ldraw, and ledit support it. What programs do not. (...) (25 years ago, 24-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: a question about modeling the 9v battery box...
|
|
Jonathan Wilson <wilsonj@xoommail.com> wrote in message news:37723A43.C63B60...ail.com... (...) That would be the ideal, but it would probably get in without that stuff, since the battery box is basically never used such that the insides show. It (...) (25 years ago, 24-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: OMR Model Creation/Submission Rules
|
|
(...) suggestion. Notice (...) including commentary (...) makes it much (...) comment, it won't (...) correctly place it in a (...) to have to put (...) there could be (...) same as the (...) I think that if it is something like 0 insert piece 2916 (...) (25 years ago, 24-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: can we please work out what to do about the black castle wall pieces?
|
|
(...) Unfortunately, we've been asking him to do this for the past couple months, and he has yet to listen. Along with proofreading, we've asked him to keep the message body text from the previous message. *Sigh* Jeff (25 years ago, 24-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: OMR Model Creation/Submission Rules
|
|
I think you guys are missing the point of Tom's excellent suggestion. Notice the "0" in front of the 2916 line. That means he's just including commentary on where the part will go if and when it becomes official. It makes it much easier to add it in (...) (25 years ago, 24-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
