 | | Re: OMR Model Creation/Submission Rules
|
|
(...) But we need to severely minimize the number of incomplete sets. Read Ampi's post. Don't think that we can make anything and everything and put it up there, there must be standards. (...) Yep. (...) No. (...) Read my post on the final file (...) (25 years ago, 16-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: OMR Model Creation/Submission Rules
|
|
(...) Correct. (...) Good point. I like the readiness system. Should we have it relative to the number of pieces, so you divide the number of parts by the number of parts in the model to get the percentage? Also, you could multiply it by a certain (...) (25 years ago, 16-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: OMR Model Creation/Submission Rules
|
|
(...) the (...) could (...) Repository. But on (...) errors - (...) large (...) anyways for (...) can strongly (...) Whatever works I guess :) I was thinking of it in a sense that as they are building the model and come across an unmade patterned (...) (25 years ago, 16-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: MPD, the OMR, and Incomplete Parts
|
|
(...) OK. You're going to have some funny-looking models, with all those missing parts. Steve (25 years ago, 16-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: part numbers screwed up?
|
|
(...) I took a look at the part files, and it appears (check the comment files in the 9903 update to be 100% sure) the following moves occured: 3942 (Cone 4 x 4 x 2) was moved to 3943. 3939 (Cone 2 x 2 x 2) was moved to 3942. 3951 was moved to 3939, (...) (25 years ago, 16-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: OMR Model Creation/Submission Rules
|
|
Tim Courtney wrote in message <199906152252.PAA294...mm.com>... (...) decorated (...) unavailable (...) errors (...) My comments: If an OMR submission is not complete i.e. elements are missing, (even these are decorated elements, minifig (...) (25 years ago, 16-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: IMPORTANT - [ldraw.org] Help Still Needed
|
|
Tim Courtney schrieb: (...) if you like, I can also format my L2P/LGEO Tutorial to be included to ldraw.org. (...) I'll do what I can. But even as a student, i have a summer course, I have a job, and I have LGEO which eats a lot of my time, along (...) (25 years ago, 15-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | part numbers screwed up?
|
|
This is wierd. It seems that some of the cone pieces are referenced badly. I ran a couple of previous updates, but they didn't fix it. 3939 is coming as 3951 and 3942 is 3939. 3951 comes in fine with its own number. Did I miss something? If not, is (...) (25 years ago, 16-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: OMR Model Creation/Submission Rules
|
|
(...) Though convenient for us, inconvenient for them. As I noted it could discourage immediate submissions, which would help the Repository. But on the other hand it would be good for people to note their own errors - especially for us, so we don't (...) (25 years ago, 16-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: OMR Model Creation/Submission Rules
|
|
(...) submitting to the (...) sure each file (...) instructions (...) reflect movable (...) unavailable decorated (...) if unavailable (...) submit an errors (...) release of the (...) different author (...) could think (...) with the (...) have the (...) (25 years ago, 15-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
