 | | Re: Parts Maintenance Idea
|
|
You are both right I actually meant that, since the date expressed in the example (ISO) was year month day I wasn't carefull enough when I read the other message. I don't know of a country which uses year day month. By the way I so what your talking (...) (26 years ago, 19-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts Maintenance Idea
|
|
Sorry cancel that I didn't read it carefully enough Japan uses Year Month Day Benoit a écrit dans le message ... (...) are (...) (26 years ago, 19-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDAO eating header comments
|
|
(...) can (...) I've noticed this too. Updating the parts does the same thing and also tries to force the LDAO header format onto the model, even if there is a different header present. A fix would be great! Thanks. --Bram Bram Lambrecht / o o \ (...) (26 years ago, 19-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: [PARTS] - Header keyword line
|
|
(...) None that I know of. If we can all agree on a general definition of these two meta-commands, I will add support for them to LDAO. My current definition for the meta-commands are (note: I've violated at least some of these rules): 0 CATEGORY (...) (26 years ago, 19-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: [PARTS] - Header keyword line
|
|
(...) I'll try. I haven't looked through my L-CAD archive so the answers will be slightly vague. (...) None that I know of, but I expect it to be added to the parts searcher soon. (...) I think CATEGORY was intended for things that belonged in (...) (26 years ago, 19-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
