 | | Re: Articles on ldraw.org out of date - I can help
|
|
(...) Any reason why we'd want that instead of just wiki.ldraw.org, or ldraw.org/wiki/? Dan (17 years ago, 2-May-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Inline POV code in official parts?
|
|
(...) Well, maybe others don't care about visible polys when it should be smooth, but it makes all the difference in the world to me. (...) Well, yeah. But that is better than everyone inventing their own POV- Ray code to make their own parts. How (...) (17 years ago, 2-May-07, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Articles on ldraw.org out of date - I can help
|
|
(...) Strike that. We can add you as an article editor. You simple need to email us with your LDraw User ID. -Orion (17 years ago, 2-May-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Inline POV code in official parts?
|
|
(...) The LDraw POV project ((URL) was created with the intention of someday becoming the de-facto, if not the actual, official LDraw compatible POV repository. I'll admit that it has languished for sometime (it's been almost 4 years sine I (...) (17 years ago, 2-May-07, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Inline POV code in official parts?
|
|
(...) It doesn't really gain you much if you are just converting the LDraw parts directly - l3p does that just fine, and fairly fast. The only advantage of a POV-ray library is when you start adding POV-ray specific stuff, eg: replace the curve (...) (17 years ago, 1-May-07, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
