 | | Re: Voting now open for April's MOTM and SOTM contests
|
|
Why not a QuickTime or a Java VR. This is a really small one, but it shows what can be done. It has about 144 frames (12 side to side by 12 up and down). (URL) could be optimized by removing rendundant frames (if left side is the same as the right, (...) (20 years ago, 6-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting now open for April's MOTM and SOTM contests
|
|
(...) I meant for YOU to use so that you got the right settings easily... :-) More seriously, I agree that most models should be at the same angles and so forth (except for huge models where the camera needs to pull back or whatever) but size drives (...) (20 years ago, 6-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting now open for April's MOTM and SOTM contests
|
|
(...) I'm resistant to this. I think all the models should be rendered with the same settings. In other words, I want the settings in the file that aren't directly related to the model (camera, floor, lighting, etc) to be same across all the (...) (20 years ago, 6-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting now open for April's MOTM and SOTM contests
|
|
(...) I tend to enjoy a camera angle of 55 for perspective renderings, the default (67, I think) has too much perspective. -Tim (20 years ago, 6-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting now open for April's MOTM and SOTM contests
|
|
(...) Well, I attempted to do that with ldglite a year or two ago: (URL) it has a few bugs, and a new L3P release with lots of handy new command line options seemed imminent at the time so I put it on the backburner. I think it should work ok to (...) (20 years ago, 6-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
