 | | Re: Purposes of the Organization
|
|
(...) I'm not sure the details of how LDraw maintains and develops the format should really go in the "Propose" of the org. Wouldn't it suffice to say: + develop and maintain the LDraw format. ? (21 years ago, 11-Sep-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Purposes of the Organization
|
|
Its been a while since the organization meta-discussion that was contained within the LSC proposal threads. Since then, I've been working off-and-on on a bylaws draft that's quite lengthy, and sending it to the ad-hoc organizing committee for (...) (21 years ago, 11-Sep-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing LDraw.org Relaunch
|
|
(...) Well done all who contributed! It's starting to look pretty good! (...) One question - will PT login eventually authenticate against the ldraw login? Currently the 2 are still separate... ROSCO (21 years ago, 11-Sep-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: numbers report - 10 Sept. 2003
|
|
(...) Hi Franklin, Good new for LDraw users, ever more files are submitted. Bad news for contributors, obviously as the number of files increases faster than reviewing human ressources, the average reviewing delay also increases. Also I have (...) (21 years ago, 10-Sep-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | numbers report - 10 Sept. 2003
|
|
Yeah, I know, it's been a while since I've done this ("(URL) Section Totals 40 certified files. 155 files need admin review. 474 files need more votes. 520 have uncertified subfiles. 156 held files. Total Files: 1,345 For comparison: 2003-09-10 - (...) (21 years ago, 10-Sep-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
