 | | Re: Mirrored parts and studs
|
|
(...) Umm, my math is really rusty. Can the sign of the determinant also be used to detect mirroring? That could be handy. Don (21 years ago, 2-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Thanks to all the parts developers
|
|
I just wanted to say thanks to Steve, Chris and all else that are involved with the developent, review and approval of the parts in the parts library. Programs can come and go, but without the parts library we'd have nothing. I think that the parts (...) (21 years ago, 2-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Mirrored parts and studs
|
|
(...) Wait a minute. Doesn't L3Input.cpp build a threaded tree structure before outputting a single POV part? I would think you could traverse the array Parts[0...nParts] and look for toplevel parts from the PARTS directory. Then for each toplevel (...) (21 years ago, 2-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: 1st LSC: Call for Nominations
|
|
(...) I was going to nominate Orion, but he beat me to it. I volunteer. (...) Kevin Clague (21 years ago, 2-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Mirrored parts and studs
|
|
(...) My view is that there is nothing _serious_ wrong, but that a fix should be welcome. Anyway. Since we are only talking about studs, the rendering programs _could_ simply remember to fix any mirrored studs (can be done by multiplying the (...) (21 years ago, 1-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Mirrored parts and studs
|
|
(...) My only concern about letting the rendering programs do this is "how they know which way to orientate the logo". Coding this within the .dat file (either with a correctly orientated stud.dat or with metadata) is preferable to storing this (...) (21 years ago, 2-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: 1st LSC: Call for Nominations
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Tim Courtney wrote: <snip> Well I volunteered before, so I volunteer now. --Orion Pobursky (21 years ago, 2-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Mirrored parts and studs
|
|
(...) And mine as well. If LDView can correct for this then so can any other program. The stud logos are a bonus feature offered by many programs but are not officailly supported by the LDraw spec. (...) This further supports my position on this (...) (21 years ago, 2-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Mirrored parts and studs
|
|
Just for kicks and grins.(not!) I'll throw in my $1.25 (...) This may have resurfaced because of the studs with logo files on my webpage. It was a quick thought I came up with a couple years ago. I guess I should remove them and any references to (...) (21 years ago, 2-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | 1st LSC: Call for Nominations
|
|
All - Now is the time for the call for nominations for the first LSC. If you're not familiar with the LSC, please read the latest proposal: (URL) [1] The way I am reading things at this point, we don't need a formal nomination structure this (...) (21 years ago, 2-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Mirrored parts and studs
|
|
(...) That is my opinion. The programs should be changed, rather than the parts. One thing to consider: even if we 'fix' all the part files so that all studs render non-mirrored logos, mirrored logos can still occur. For example, if someone created (...) (21 years ago, 2-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Mirrored parts and studs [DAT]
|
|
(...) **snip** (...) Ah, the perennial question. During a past discussion of this very topic I offered what I thought to be a semi-workable option similar to #2 above, which I reiterate in the interest of further stirring the pot: We could redo the (...) (21 years ago, 1-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Mirrored parts and studs
|
|
(...) LDView does not have a problem with mirrored studs. (...) Right! See my posting (URL) Cobbs also explains it well in (URL) 2.) The part itself is flawed in that the studs are mirrored. We should redo (...) Though I acknowledge that L3P should (...) (21 years ago, 1-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Mirrored parts and studs
|
|
(...) I'm not going to comment on the actual question, but I want to make it clear that LDView should NOT display the logo mirrored, ever. It automatically detects that the stud has been mirrored, and mirrors the logo back to its correct (...) (21 years ago, 1-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Mirrored parts and studs
|
|
(...) Good summation. My preference is 1... a sufficiently clever convertor could perhaps detect this rotation and use rotated versions of the studs that it substitutes somehow in a preprocess step??? If there is a way to do 2 (perhaps with a (...) (21 years ago, 1-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Mirrored parts and studs
|
|
(...) Thats what i did with the re-upload of some files from the 2865.dat & 32087.dat parts (9V straight track, 9V track cross ) and the recently posted 2867.dat (9V Curved track). I moved the studs from the subparts to the main file. With the (...) (21 years ago, 1-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Mirrored parts and studs
|
|
I am generally against new meta-commands, but inspired by "0 BFD INVERTNEXT", how about something like "0 MIRRORING KEEPPOSITIVENEXT". The more accurate syntax, I leave to the gurus... /Tore (21 years ago, 1-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Mirrored parts and studs [DAT]
|
|
(...) I favour the following scenario - put the part detail in a subpart, but the studs themselves in the main part files. s\xxxxs01.dat bulk of part excluding decorated surfaces and studs (handedness of lowest numbered part) xxxx.dat 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 (...) (21 years ago, 1-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Mirrored parts and studs
|
|
There is somewhat of a disagreeance going on over at the PT about mirrored parts and I thought I'd bring it to the whole community to discuss. Here's a little background for the non initiated: In order to same time and DAT code if a part has a (...) (21 years ago, 1-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | formatting errors in FTX?? (wa Re: LSC Proposal 0.99a
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Tim Courtney wrote: I like this draft a lot however there seem to be some word lossages here and there... the tail end of some phrases are missing, and I think it may be due to the FTX formatting??? for example: On the (...) (21 years ago, 1-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.publish)
|
