Parts Primitives : 195


CAD / LDraw Files / Parts / Primitives / 195	194 \| 196

Subject:	Re: Two questions on primitives
Newsgroups:	lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives
Date:	Fri, 29 Mar 2002 02:10:38 GMT
Viewed:	10 times

In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Philippe Hurbain writes: > The INVERTNEXT directive takes care of this problem. > Quoted from BFC proposal: > "INVERTNEXT > This option inverts a subfile. It may only be used immediately before a > subfile command line, and it only influences the immediately following > subfile command." I'm concerned that if we release those primitives that can be used as both inside and outside surfaces as BFC complient, we'll have to go back to all the other pieces that use them to insert the INVERTNEXT directive (where appropriate). Otherwise some renderers, like L3Lab, will render pieces incorrectly. -Orion

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: Two questions on primitives
(...) Is this a real issue? Parts can't be truly BFC compliant until all of their subparts are BFC compliant. So yes, you'll have to insert those INVERTNEXT commands. But the part wasn't BFC compliant before, and this is just another part of (...) (23 years ago, 29-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives, lugnet.cad.dev)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: Two questions on primitives
(...) The INVERTNEXT directive takes care of this problem. Quoted from BFC proposal: "INVERTNEXT This option inverts a subfile. It may only be used immediately before a subfile command line, and it only influences the immediately following subfile (...) (23 years ago, 28-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)

10 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search