Parts Primitives : 194


CAD / LDraw Files / Parts / Primitives / 194	193 \| 195

Subject:	Re: Why aren't the technic gear teeth primitives?
Newsgroups:	lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives
Date:	Thu, 28 Mar 2002 17:32:23 GMT
Viewed:	1694 times

In lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives, Mark Kennedy wrote: > I was thinking that the teeth for the old technic gears (3647-1649) and the > beveled ones (32270 and 32296) should be made into primitives. I tried editing > the 3648 part in ldraw, but the file was too big to even load! Are the teeth the same between different parts? If they are different, it doesn't make much sense to have primitives for each one. Even if the teeth are different, it would be possible to make subfiles for the teeth. This could make sense for the higher-tooth-count gears. Steve

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: Why aren't the technic gear teeth primitives?
(...) editing (...) The teeth on the small 8 tooth gear are slightly different from the larger ones(Though in the file they are pretty much drawn as trapezoidal boxes). But on the two beveled gears they apear practicly identical as far as I can (...) (23 years ago, 29-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)

Message is in Reply To:

		Why aren't the technic gear teeth primitives?
I was thinking that the teeth for the old technic gears (3647-1649) and the beveled ones (32270 and 32296) should be made into primitives. I tried editing the 3648 part in ldraw, but the file was too big to even load! (23 years ago, 28-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)

4 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search