 | | Re: New primitive: Ring 2 Small Hole [DAT]
|
|
(...) I didn't know this. Thanks for explain! (...) I used the ring1 to construct the ring: 1 16 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 ring1.dat 1 16 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 ring2.dat because if I scale down the ring2.dat, the thickness of the border will be 1/2, (...) (23 years ago, 18-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: Question about a new kind of stud
|
|
(...) I replied to your posting of the ring file. (...) Good question. :) (...) Since it is a stud, I'd say you should post stud9.dat as a primitive. But replace ring2a.dat with the two-line construction I posted in my earlier message. Also, if you (...) (23 years ago, 18-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: New primitive: Ring 2 Small Hole [DAT]
|
|
(...) There's a problem with this. In LDraw-world, "Ring X" is shorthand for "a ring with inner radius = X and outer radius = (X+1)". Your ring has IR=1/3 and OR=1, right? I don't think there's any way a ring can be constructed so that 3*IR = OR (...) (23 years ago, 18-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | New primitive: Ring 2 Small Hole [DAT]
|
|
this is the ring used in the new kind of stud that can be found in this piece: (2 URLs) Ring 2 Small hole 0 Name: ring2a.dat 0 Author: Ildefonso Junior Zanette 0 Unofficial Subpart 4 16 0.3333 0 0 0.3079 0 0.1276 0.9239 0 0.3827 1 0 0 4 16 0.3079 0 (...) (23 years ago, 18-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Question about a new kind of stud [DAT]
|
|
Hi, I'm modelling the following part: (URL) "Door 1 x 4 x 6 Frame", but this part has a different kind of stud: (URL) I didn't find this stud in the primitives directory, so, I start modelling it. Also, I didn't find a ring compatible with the (...) (23 years ago, 18-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: Stud Primitive Question
|
|
I'm a moron. I had studs on low resolution and thought they were 8 sided. My mistake. -Orion (23 years ago, 16-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: Stud Primitive Question
|
|
(...) Studs aren't 8-sided cylinders; they are 16-sided cylinders just like the other cylinders. The low-resolution stud files are 8-sided cylinders. These files have the same filenames as the regular studs, but with a '2' instead of a 'd' (i.e. (...) (23 years ago, 16-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Stud Primitive Question
|
|
Does anyone know why studs are 8 sided cylindars but every other cylindar based object in LDraw is 16 sided?. Has this issue ever been addressed? -Orion (23 years ago, 15-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: New stud 4 primitive for plates with holes
|
|
Don Heyse wrote... (...) Subpart is a better idea. Can be shared by several parts. Somehow I also feel that a primitive should be an object, one unbroken object and not separated objects. How much space do you really save? Bernd Broich wrote... (...) (23 years ago, 20-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: New stud 4 primitive for plates with holes
|
|
(...) I haven't thought of that, but I'll take it into consideration. (23 years ago, 16-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
