To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitivesOpen lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / LDraw Files / Parts / Primitives / 186
185  |  187
Special: 
[DAT] (requires LDraw-compatible viewer)
Subject: 
New primitive: Ring 2 Small Hole
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives
Date: 
Mon, 18 Mar 2002 21:41:57 GMT
Viewed: 
1530 times
  
  this is the ring used in the new kind of stud that can be found in this piece:
  http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?i=131214
  http://www.peeron.com/inv/parts/30179


0 Ring 2 Small hole
0 Name: ring2a.dat
0 Author: Ildefonso Junior Zanette
0 Unofficial Subpart

4 16 0.3333 0 0 0.3079 0 0.1276 0.9239 0 0.3827 1 0 0
4 16 0.3079 0 0.1276 0.2357 0 0.2357 0.7071 0 0.7071 0.9239 0 0.3827
4 16 0.2357 0 0.2357 0.1276 0 0.3079 0.3827 0 0.9239 0.7071 0 0.7071
4 16 0.1276 0 0.3079 0 0 0.3333 0 0 1 0.3827 0 0.9239
4 16 0 0 0.3333 -0.1276 0 0.3079 -0.3827 0 0.9239 0 0 1
4 16 -0.1276 0 0.3079 -0.2357 0 0.2357 -0.7071 0 0.7071 -0.3827 0 0.9239
4 16 -0.2357 0 0.2357 -0.3079 0 0.1276 -0.9239 0 0.3827 -0.7071 0 0.7071
4 16 -0.3079 0 0.1276 -0.3333 0 0 -1 0 0 -0.9239 0 0.3827
4 16 -0.3333 0 0 -0.3079 0 -0.1276 -0.9239 0 -0.3827 -1 0 0
4 16 -0.3079 0 -0.1276 -0.2357 0 -0.2357 -0.7071 0 -0.7071 -0.9239 0 -0.3827
4 16 -0.2357 0 -0.2357 -0.1276 0 -0.3079 -0.3827 0 -0.9239 -0.7071 0 -0.7071
4 16 -0.1276 0 -0.3079 0 0 -0.3333 0 0 -1 -0.3827 0 -0.9239
4 16 0 0 -0.3333 0.1276 0 -0.3079 0.3827 0 -0.9239 0 0 -1
4 16 0.1276 0 -0.3079 0.2357 0 -0.2357 0.7071 0 -0.7071 0.3827 0 -0.9239
4 16 0.2357 0 -0.2357 0.3079 0 -0.1276 0.9239 0 -0.3827 0.7071 0 -0.7071
4 16 0.3079 0 -0.1276 0.3333 0 0 1 0 0 0.9239 0 -0.3827
0



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: New primitive: Ring 2 Small Hole  [DAT]
 
(...) There's a problem with this. In LDraw-world, "Ring X" is shorthand for "a ring with inner radius = X and outer radius = (X+1)". Your ring has IR=1/3 and OR=1, right? I don't think there's any way a ring can be constructed so that 3*IR = OR (...) (23 years ago, 18-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)

3 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR