| |
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives, Ildefonso Junior Zanette writes:
> I'm modelling the following part:
> http://www.peeron.com/inv/parts/30179 "Door 1 x 4 x 6 Frame", but this
> part has a different kind of stud:
> http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?i=131214
Great! :)
> I didn't find this stud in the primitives directory, so, I start modelling
> it. Also, I didn't find a ring compatible with the dimensions of the ring in
> this stud, so, I modelled it too.
I replied to your posting of the ring file.
> Do I have to submit all those new primitives or inline them in my
> 30179.dat file?
Good question. :)
> I think that submitting the new primitives may help others who will try to
> model files that include this kind of stud. However, this kind of stud is
> not very common, and maybe it is better to inline them in the part's dat
> file and do not overload the primitives directory with those "non-common"
> pieces.
Since it is a stud, I'd say you should post stud9.dat as a primitive. But
replace ring2a.dat with the two-line construction I posted in my earlier
message.
Also, if you want to submit a stud-primitive, you'll need to create a
similar "fast-draw" stu29.dat file. stu29.dat should only have 8 segments.
Compare stud.dat to stu2.dat to see how "fast-draw" studs compare to regular
stud files.
Steve
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Question about a new kind of stud [DAT]
|
| Hi, I'm modelling the following part: (URL) "Door 1 x 4 x 6 Frame", but this part has a different kind of stud: (URL) I didn't find this stud in the primitives directory, so, I start modelling it. Also, I didn't find a ring compatible with the (...) (25 years ago, 18-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
2 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
