 | | Re: Question about a new kind of stud
|
|
(...) I replied to your posting of the ring file. (...) Good question. :) (...) Since it is a stud, I'd say you should post stud9.dat as a primitive. But replace ring2a.dat with the two-line construction I posted in my earlier message. Also, if you (...) (24 years ago, 18-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
 | | Re: New primitive: Ring 2 Small Hole [DAT]
|
|
(...) There's a problem with this. In LDraw-world, "Ring X" is shorthand for "a ring with inner radius = X and outer radius = (X+1)". Your ring has IR=1/3 and OR=1, right? I don't think there's any way a ring can be constructed so that 3*IR = OR (...) (24 years ago, 18-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
 | | New primitive: Ring 2 Small Hole [DAT]
|
|
this is the ring used in the new kind of stud that can be found in this piece: (2 URLs) Ring 2 Small hole 0 Name: ring2a.dat 0 Author: Ildefonso Junior Zanette 0 Unofficial Subpart 4 16 0.3333 0 0 0.3079 0 0.1276 0.9239 0 0.3827 1 0 0 4 16 0.3079 0 (...) (24 years ago, 18-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
 | | Question about a new kind of stud [DAT]
|
|
Hi, I'm modelling the following part: (URL) "Door 1 x 4 x 6 Frame", but this part has a different kind of stud: (URL) I didn't find this stud in the primitives directory, so, I start modelling it. Also, I didn't find a ring compatible with the (...) (24 years ago, 18-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
 | | Re: Stud Primitive Question
|
|
I'm a moron. I had studs on low resolution and thought they were 8 sided. My mistake. -Orion (24 years ago, 16-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
 | | Re: Stud Primitive Question
|
|
(...) Studs aren't 8-sided cylinders; they are 16-sided cylinders just like the other cylinders. The low-resolution stud files are 8-sided cylinders. These files have the same filenames as the regular studs, but with a '2' instead of a 'd' (i.e. (...) (24 years ago, 16-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
 | | Stud Primitive Question
|
|
Does anyone know why studs are 8 sided cylindars but every other cylindar based object in LDraw is 16 sided?. Has this issue ever been addressed? -Orion (24 years ago, 15-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
 | | Re: New stud 4 primitive for plates with holes
|
|
Don Heyse wrote... (...) Subpart is a better idea. Can be shared by several parts. Somehow I also feel that a primitive should be an object, one unbroken object and not separated objects. How much space do you really save? Bernd Broich wrote... (...) (24 years ago, 20-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
 | | Re: New stud 4 primitive for plates with holes
|
|
(...) I haven't thought of that, but I'll take it into consideration. (24 years ago, 16-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
 | | Re: New stud 4 primitive for plates with holes [DAT]
|
|
(...) If you made this a subpart (instead of a primitive) and included the original stud4 primitive you'd save more space and possibly avoid the square hole problem? Of course then you have the problem of that undesireable edge line on the inside of (...) (24 years ago, 12-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|