 | | ring5.dat [DAT]
|
|
here is a new ring primitive 0 4 16 5 0 0 4.6195 0 1.9135 5.5433 0 2.2961 6 0 0 4 16 4.6195 0 1.9135 3.5355 0 3.5355 4.2426 0 4.2426 5.5433 0 2.2961 4 16 3.5355 0 3.5355 1.9135 0 4.6195 2.2961 0 5.5433 4.2426 0 4.2426 4 16 1.9135 0 4.6195 0 0 5 0 0 (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jul-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: New unofficial 2-4ring2.dat primitive
|
|
(...) You're right. I'm a bit green and posted in a burst of enthusiasm. As is many times the case, I realized what you've pointed out shortly after leaving the message. Thanks for the feedback. The good news is that the piece I'm doing, although (...) (23 years ago, 17-Jun-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: New unofficial 2-4ring2.dat primitive [DAT]
|
|
(...) This look OK, but is not consistent with the other 2-4ring* primitives. Yours comprises the two quadrants in the -z direction - for consistency I believe it should comprise the two quadrants in the +z direction. This already exists in the (...) (23 years ago, 16-Jun-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | New unofficial 2-4ring2.dat primitive [DAT]
|
|
Hi all, In the process of creating piece 6643 (technic flex system connector), I've noticed the lack of several official primitive that I need. Included in this message is the first. Please notice that I am stil somewhat green in Ldraw (but I have (...) (23 years ago, 16-Jun-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: Alternative possible hi-res sphere primitive
|
|
(...) Hey, Travis Your hi-res sphere looks great! Much better than the other one available (Sorry, Steve, but it does look smoother and more even). I've begun to model my own Parts and Primitives library in MLCad. I've run into a wall with modelling (...) (23 years ago, 25-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | new primitive 4-4ring8.dat [DAT]
|
|
Here is a new primitive I made up for a new piece I just finished. It's basicly the same as 1-4ring8 except it goes all the way. 0 1 16 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1-4ring8.dat 1 16 0 0 0 0.00 0 1 0 1 0 -1 0 0.00 1-4ring8.dat 1 16 0 0 0 -1 0 0.00 0 1 0 (...) (24 years ago, 31-Mar-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: [Idea] New kind of tore for large diameter
|
|
(...) note: I've made toroidal bits before, using an approach similar to 2741c.dat, except I built 2741c.dat out of a 4-4cyli.dat and some 2-4cyls.dat. The reason we had the recent discussions about standardized torus p-files was so it would be easy (...) (24 years ago, 1-Mar-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: [Idea] New kind of torus for large diameter
|
|
(...) Euhh... I mean a new kind of torus ( = tore in french) Good luck for your work to reduce your diameter ;8-) Marc Klein A Mindstorms fan. (24 years ago, 1-Mar-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: [Idea] New kind of tore for large diameter
|
|
Yes, a new kind of Tore would be great, but I'm afaid you'll have to suffer me the way I am. ;o) Btw, I'm working on reducising my diameter. /Tore (...) -- Tore Eriksson Sweden ICQ: 76066510 LEGO: MOC++++ FS,SP,TO++ TC+ LS YB@m (24 years ago, 1-Mar-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | [Idea] New kind of tore for large diameter [DAT]
|
|
I have defined a tore that does not use the tore primitive because the standard primitive where to rough for a tore of that diameter. The 48 version was to detailed for me. The file 2741c.dat could be a base for a new sort of tore primitive. It has (...) (24 years ago, 28-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
