 | | [part] mockup/for-post of 30407 [DAT]
|
|
i have several people asking what 30407 is. its not exactly finished. but im posting it so people can see what it is {I used swh4.dat for this {cause im lasy}} [unofficial/noncompleted post] 0 Name: sw30407.dat 0 Author: thomas burger 0 Inlined:1 16 (...) (25 years ago, 31-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: [part] mockup/for-post of 30407
|
|
(...) Using swh4.dat is a good idea. No use re-inventing the wheel. That subfile is going to be in the next update, so you can plan on using it as a subfile in this piece. -- Terry K -- (25 years ago, 1-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: [part] mockup/for-post of 30407 [DAT]
|
|
Thomas Burger <TBurger666@aol.com> wrote in message news:FCLAw2.8qr@lugnet.com... (...) Ouch. I KNOW what it is. I have been working on it for two or three days now...... Looking at yours, yours is a little "beefier" looking, and on mine the hinge (...) (25 years ago, 1-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: [part] mockup/for-post of 30407
|
|
(...) Looks good, though I would suggest inlining unofficial subparts when posting parts. Swh1.dat is the correct subpart for this. I wrote swh4.dat specifically for the cockpit, since half the hinge is thinner at one end. -John Van (25 years ago, 5-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: [part] mockup/for-post of 30407
|
|
John VanZwieten <john_vanzwieten@msn.com> wrote in message news:FCtvCC.6o8@lugnet.com... (...) posting Oops. Sorry. (...) I just used the one that looked right. BTW, how did you create these parts? They look soooooo good. Beautiful work. (25 years ago, 5-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: [part] mockup/for-post of 30407
|
|
(...) They provided a good challenge to be sure. The two-fingered parts involved lots of trig, while the one fingered part took plenty of trial and error. Modeling the area where the "nubs" on the two fingers slip into the indentions on the (...) (25 years ago, 6-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
