 | | Re: "Dither" colors in patterned/sticker parts
|
|
(...) I would go for this option. I'm not a fan of allowing RGB values in official part files, I'd rather keep it to color codes. However, if there could be a standard for texture mapping patterns & stickers (and parts made by mixing multiple colors (...) (15 years ago, 9-Feb-10, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: "Dither" colors in patterned/sticker parts
|
|
(...) I hadn't thought about this, but I kinda like the idea. The original LDRAW defined values for all color codes, and some of the newer codes were assigned because they are a variation/change from existing colors. The downside of this idea is (...) (15 years ago, 9-Feb-10, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: "Dither" colors in patterned/sticker parts
|
|
Hello, "Travis Cobbs" <tcobbs@REMOVEgmail.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:KxEAq2.86J@lugnet.com... (...) I used dithered colors in the "Flag 2x2 with Goblets and Grapes" (2335p40). So in this case no other color would match the silver or gold color (...) (15 years ago, 9-Feb-10, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: "Dither" colors in patterned/sticker parts
|
|
(...) I have authored patterned parts, and for me this is the only viable option. This has worked just fine for the past decade, and I don't see any good reason why it should be broken. The second option (using 0x2RRGGBB) would just be very (...) (15 years ago, 8-Feb-10, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: "Dither" colors in patterned/sticker parts
|
|
(...) I didn't get it right at all, but now I think I do. It isn't an issue here and, believe it or not, I'm cool with it. :) (...) Good! :) (...) I'm glad that at least I'm not alone with this opinion. :) /T (15 years ago, 7-Feb-10, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: "Dither" colors in patterned/sticker parts
|
|
(...) Two things. First of all, is Maersk Blue hard-coded into any part files? I would expect parts that show up in Maersk Blue to have color 16 encoded in the file, and the user to select Maersk Blue as the parts' color when building a model. Since (...) (15 years ago, 7-Feb-10, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: "Dither" colors in patterned/sticker parts
|
|
(...) I don't know if I got that right. Isn't Maersk Blue one of those part colors most wrongfully and misleadingly labeled as a "dithered" color? (...) I suggest the 0x2RRGGBB form is recommended for less "basic"/established pattern and sticker (...) (15 years ago, 7-Feb-10, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: "Dither" colors in patterned/sticker parts
|
|
(...) I'm not much of a part author, so my opinion probably counts for even less than usual here, but I actually find myself agreeing with Willy on a issue involving colors. That never happens! ;) But heck, who can argue against freedom and (...) (15 years ago, 6-Feb-10, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: "Dither" colors in patterned/sticker parts
|
|
(...) It would be very interesting which applications can not work with the (RGB colors (of the form 0x2RRGGBB)). Are they useful/necessary/developed? If someone has those application to test and make a summary of that would be great. cu mikeheide (15 years ago, 6-Feb-10, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: "Dither" colors in patterned/sticker parts
|
|
(...) For what it counts, I'd go for: * Explicitly disallow "dither" colors in all official parts, but allow RGB colors (of the form 0x2RRGGBB) in their place in patterned/sticker parts. This solution would give me the most freedom. I could just (...) (15 years ago, 6-Feb-10, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | "Dither" colors in patterned/sticker parts
|
|
Please read and respond to this message if you are a parts author, particularly if you have authored any patterned or sticker parts. The LSC is trying to come up with rules for colors for both LDConfig.ldr and official parts. We are having an (...) (15 years ago, 6-Feb-10, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: POV dat for L3P v1.4 - 3626bpse - Minifig Head with SW Scout Trooper Black Visor Pattern - POV
|
|
(...) Sorry for the late answer. L3P v1.4 has L3Version declared, v1.3 has not. #ifdef (L3Version) material { L3Color0 } #else #if (version >= 3.1) material #else texture #end { Color0 } #end (L3P v1.4 does not support PovRay < 3.1) For the studs I (...) (15 years ago, 14-Jan-10, to lugnet.cad.ray, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: BBB Medium drivers
|
|
(...) Hi Tim, the download site works and the parts look very good. Thanks for sharing these! Ben (...) (15 years ago, 24-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | BBB Medium drivers
|
|
I recently made some crude but perfectly useable versions of the BBB medium drivers: both flanged and blind. They're a fair bit smaller than Ben's originals and make extensive use of primitives. <https://sites.googl...elgambort/ (URL) Since BS (...) (15 years ago, 23-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Search for 49668.dat (Plate 1x2 Tooth)
|
|
(...) Thanks ROSCO (15 years ago, 22-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Search for 49668.dat (Plate 1x2 Tooth)
|
|
(...) It's in the official library - (URL) (15 years ago, 21-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Search for 49668.dat (Plate 1x2 Tooth)
|
|
(...) in the official library or the parts tracker? ROSCO (15 years ago, 21-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Technic Shock Absorber 6.5L
|
|
Hello all, How likely is it this (reworked) part will be in the next (<6mnts or so) official library? Cause I'm working on realtime spring generation in my LD4DStudio project and would really like to include a sample using these (classic) shocks (...) (15 years ago, 12-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Request part 31367 (Duplo Container Egg Base)
|
|
Hello all, Is there a parts author in posession of the part who can author it? Duplo Container Egg Base (URL) Bliss did a wonderful job for me years ago creating the top of the egg ((URL) that never made it to parts tracker (could be submitted (...) (15 years ago, 5-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic ball joint socket naming
|
|
(...) Seems OK to me, but I don't like "circular" too much. Rounded, perhaps? Philo (15 years ago, 2-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
