 | | Re: L(EGO)Draw parts - 2nd batch
|
|
(...) Thanks. 30172.dat and 47847.dat will be posted soon, 30135 a bit later. Philo (16 years ago, 8-Jan-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: L(EGO)Draw parts - 2nd batch
|
|
(...) Philo, I added the submission dates to the chart. Pick it from the list. w. (16 years ago, 8-Jan-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: L(EGO)Draw parts - 2nd batch
|
|
Hi Willy, (...) What about the mention "0 !HISTORY 2007-08-25 {The LEGO Universe Team} Original part shape" for these new parts? Should we change the date? Philo (16 years ago, 6-Jan-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: L(EGO)Draw parts - 2nd batch
|
|
(...) I woudln't bother pushing this. LEGO is being very nice to the fan community by providing us parts in LDRAW DAT format. I'd leave it at that. Jeff (16 years ago, 23-Dec-08, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: L(EGO)Draw parts - 2nd batch
|
|
(...) For sure it would be best to get a file format closer from the original design (.stl for example), to be able to tweak stl2dat parameters for better results. Or to create directly POV versions... Philo (16 years ago, 23-Dec-08, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: L(EGO)Draw parts - 2nd batch
|
|
(...) Mike, The LU Team submits directly in LDraw. As you can see in the header: 0 Created with stl2dat conversion tool they use Marc Klein's converter. It is known that TLG uses a heavily modified Maya to author parts. Bye, w. (16 years ago, 23-Dec-08, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: L(EGO)Draw parts - 2nd batch
|
|
I'm curious as to what the differences between the format they submitted them to you are? For instance, do the models you've received have surface normals? -Mike (16 years ago, 21-Dec-08, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | L(EGO)Draw parts - 2nd batch
|
|
Hi folks, as an early X-Mas present the LEGO Universe Team has shared another batch of part shapes with the community, with the purpose to make them fit for the LDraw Parts Tracker. This time the focus is on Minifig Headgear but there are also some (...) (16 years ago, 20-Dec-08, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.announce)
|
| |
| | Re: x210c01 ChromeSilver Drill 4 x 4 x 7
|
|
(...) When the curvature is the only concern, then yes, but I have to take the screwshape into consideration, the closer I am to the ideal curve, the easier it is to calculate the screwshape and avoid holes in the part. Furthermore when thinking (...) (16 years ago, 13-Dec-08, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: x210c01 ChromeSilver Drill 4 x 4 x 7
|
|
(...) Welcome back! (...) I agree with Mikeheide, since the total curvature is low I think 6 cones would be more than enough! (...) Seems a good approach. As for the edge line between screw and cones, Isecalc will provide it instantly! (It would be (...) (16 years ago, 12-Dec-08, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: x210c01 ChromeSilver Drill 4 x 4 x 7
|
|
(...) I do not understand correctly what you are saying. If you use a cone primitive you can stretch it in all direction. There is no need to use "about 40 cones". A maximum of 10 should do the same! You should use for this the program "cones and (...) (16 years ago, 12-Dec-08, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: x210c01 ChromeSilver Drill 4 x 4 x 7
|
|
(...) Just to refresh my memory ( I haven't done any parts since 2951) The 48 primitives divide a circle in 48 straight lines, right? That would for a 60 LDU diameter mean that each straight line is approx 4 LDU's long, so using coneshapes each 4 (...) (16 years ago, 11-Dec-08, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: x210c01 ChromeSilver Drill 4 x 4 x 7
|
|
(...) None I know... (...) The official way is to ask a number to a LDraw admin. That said there are numerous parts on tracker named px... (would be px210c01 here) (...) Yes you should be able to use stacked cone primitives. As Travis suggested the (...) (16 years ago, 11-Dec-08, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: x210c01 ChromeSilver Drill 4 x 4 x 7
|
|
(...) If you do find a way to use primitives, you'll probably need to use the \48 ones. I don't think 16 segments is enough for the thicker part of the drill, and switching from one resolution to another part-way along seems like it would be tricky. (...) (16 years ago, 11-Dec-08, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | x210c01 ChromeSilver Drill 4 x 4 x 7
|
|
Has anyone been working on this? I used the Peeron partnumber, would that be correct? I have determined that the shape of the "body" of the drill is extremely close to 5+(x+3)^(1/1.58), does any primitives exist that are useable for such a curved (...) (16 years ago, 11-Dec-08, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Is anyone working on 32745?
|
|
I'm happy to announce it is now available on parts tracker. (URL) (16 years ago, 18-Nov-08, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: LSC-ratified change to sticker spec
|
|
(...) Sorry about that. What I meant to say was "sides and back", not "sides and edges". My bad. --Travis (16 years ago, 18-Nov-08, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LSC-ratified change to sticker spec
|
|
(...) Due to a current conversation I want to mention that not only the sides of the sticker should have the predominant color but also the backside of the sticker.Please read the complete sticker spec for official parts! cu mikeheide (16 years ago, 17-Nov-08, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | LSC-ratified change to sticker spec
|
|
The LSC just ratified and made changes to the (URL) sticker spec for official parts>. There were two main changes, and one minor change to accommodate one of the main changes: The transparent portion of clear stickers should now be modeled in color (...) (16 years ago, 17-Nov-08, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Is anyone working on 32745?
|
|
(...) Gosh. I forgot this thread. I have been working on this part for some time now, and I have a few things done (mainly the rear half, I was going to work on front part). I hope I have not duplicated too much of your work. Could you keep me in (...) (16 years ago, 7-Nov-08, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
