 | | Re: NonCA-parts in need of re-writing
|
|
(...) LEGOs haven't been made of CA for decades, so wouldn't that be the vast majority of parts? Sorry... I know that in the LEGO CAD world "CA" must stand for something else, but I just couldn't resist ; ) David "Fuzzy" Gregory (18 years ago, 12-Jun-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
|
 | | Re: NonCA-parts in need of re-writing
|
|
(...) Part 2714 rewritten... Philo (18 years ago, 12-Jun-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
|
 | | Re: NonCA-parts in need of re-writing
|
|
(...) Legalities - observing Steve (18 years ago, 12-Jun-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
|
 | | Re: NonCA-parts in need of re-writing
|
|
(...) Wheel - re-inventing Tim (18 years ago, 12-Jun-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
|
 | | Re: NonCA-parts in need of re-writing
|
|
--snip-- (...) What makes you think that? Tim (18 years ago, 12-Jun-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
|
 | | Re: NonCA-parts in need of re-writing
|
|
(...) Sorry to sound negative, but this is just a waste of time. Tim (18 years ago, 12-Jun-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
|
 | | NonCA-parts in need of re-writing
|
|
Hi folks, At www.ldraw.org you will find a list of files in the official library, whose original author has not affirmed the CA and therefore need to be re-written by CA-authors. (URL) Howard and Guy Vivan have already put a lot of effort in this (...) (18 years ago, 12-Jun-07, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.announce) !!
|
|
 | | Re: Snowmobile tread hubs?
|
|
Yes I have just completed a first draft but have not submitted to LDraw yet. It still contains many error but is ready for use. Donald (18 years ago, 14-May-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
|
 | | Snowmobile tread hubs?
|
|
Anybody working on these wheels? (URL) (18 years ago, 11-May-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
|
 | | Re: Trapezoid flag 2 X 2 unknown part number
|
|
(...) This is part 44676 and already on the Parts Tracker at : (URL) (18 years ago, 29-Apr-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
|
 | | Trapezoid flag 2 X 2 unknown part number [DAT]
|
|
Here is a model for the trapezoidal flag 2 X 2. The part had no visible number so any idea what to name it? 0 Flag 2 x 2 trapezoid 0 Name: unknown? 0 Author: Mark Kennedy 0 BFC CERTIFY CW 1 16 0 10 30 0 0 2 10 1 0 20 0 0 rect.dat 1 16 0 20 10 2 0 0 (...) (18 years ago, 29-Apr-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
|
 | | Re: Help need
|
|
(...) Si, accosento that the "pipistrello" part is not the best to begin with as an unexperienced LDraw author. I had it in my LDraw todo-bucket before I sold my LEGO collection. I regret that I didn't withhold that bucket from the deal, or I could (...) (19 years ago, 17-Apr-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
|
 | | Re: Help need
|
|
(...) ciao miriana, la creazione di parts (specialmente di un freeform come il pipistrello) richiede una certa esperienza CAD per raggiungere un risultato soddisfacente in breve tempo - e comunque prima che il tutto diventasse troppo frustrante. se (...) (19 years ago, 17-Apr-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
|
 | | Help need
|
|
Hi! I'm Miriana, from Italy. I'm a Lego fan and I need help to make own part. Now I'm making howgwarts castel and I noticed that some parts are not on database. Can I make them by my own? For example if I want make bat part (30103.dat) how can I (...) (19 years ago, 17-Apr-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
|
 | | light.dat has wrong title
|
|
The part title for light.dat is as follows: Pov-RAY Light Source (useless to give a color to it) This title is wrong. Even the L3P that's been out for years pays attention to the color, and creates a light source that matches the given color. (...) (19 years ago, 6-Apr-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
|
 | | Re: Getting rif off the 8.3 nomenclature???
|
|
(...) I just don't want people confusing naming conventions in the part library with naming conventions in Linetype 1 part references. I was mostly replying to Kevin saying his applications choke on spaces in part references, which is something I'd (...) (19 years ago, 4-Apr-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
|
 | | Re: Getting rif off the 8.3 nomenclature???
|
|
(...) You should also consider stripping trailing whitespace from the end of the filename. I believe MLCad and most of the other programs do this. Whitespace in filenames has been supported by many Ldraw programs for quite a while, but it does not (...) (19 years ago, 2-Apr-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
|
 | | Re: Getting rif off the 8.3 nomenclature???
|
|
(...) I very strongly support allowing the inclusion of whitespace in LDraw filenames, provided the first character is not whitespace. Bricksmith has always allowed users to do this. When parsing a line, I get all the matrix numbers, skip all (...) (19 years ago, 2-Apr-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
|
 | | Re: Getting rif off the 8.3 nomenclature??? (scanf tricks)
|
|
(...) That's a nifty scanf trick. But don't forget, you might still want to (URL) trim leading and trailing whitespace> (tabs and space characters) from the parsed filename (and maybe even surrounding quotes). Don (19 years ago, 29-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev, FTX)
|
|
 | | Re: Getting rif off the 8.3 nomenclature??? (scanf tricks)
|
|
(...) <snip> (...) Hi Jim, Thanks! I'll use it. Kevin (19 years ago, 29-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev, FTX)
|