 | | LSC adopts "de-facto" BFC standard as the draft standard
|
|
The LDraw Standards Committee (LSC) has adopted the "de-facto" Back Face Culling (BFC) standard ((URL) as their draft standard. We are now working on clarifying a few minor ambiguities in the draft standard so that it can be ratified as the official (...) (19 years ago, 15-Oct-06, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Question to parts authors about BFC CERTIFY
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Travis Cobbs wrote: > So, my question is this: should I remove this warning from LDView for commands > that contain options in addition to CERTIFY and CW/CCW? I definitely think that > it's appropriate to warn when multiple (...) (19 years ago, 12-Oct-06, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Question to parts authors about BFC CERTIFY [DAT]
|
|
As many parts authors are aware, LDView produces a warning if it finds more than one instance of the CERTIFY option among the BFC commands in one file. For example, the following will produce a warning on the second BFC command: 0 BFC CERTIFY CCW 1 (...) (19 years ago, 12-Oct-06, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: New parts header format validated by the LSC
|
|
LOL, I think it'll be totally free from bugs before I have even time to THINK about making new parts ;) Anyways, it's a relief that I don't have to worry about this too at the moment... CYA sometime next summer Cheers NB (19 years ago, 9-Oct-06, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: New parts header format validated by the LSC
|
|
Niels Bugge schrieb: (...) You can give my new program DATHeader (Windows) a try to maintain the correct header. First Bug fixes are made, so I think it could be useful for you. cu MikeHeide (19 years ago, 8-Oct-06, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: New parts header format validated by the LSC
|
|
(...) Yes, as an author you will need to worry about it for newly submitted parts, because the Parts Tracker submit process will start checking for adherence to this. We will take care of the existing officlal library and the files currently on the (...) (19 years ago, 7-Oct-06, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New parts header format validated by the LSC
|
|
I'm sorry if this question has ben brought up in other threads, but I'm really streached thin with real life business at the moment and can't really follow the pt or lugnet (at least for the next half year). ...I'd just like to know if this header (...) (19 years ago, 6-Oct-06, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New parts header format validated by the LSC
|
|
(...) This format has now been adopted - see Appendix I of (URL) (19 years ago, 29-Sep-06, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | New parts header format - Appendix I
|
|
The LDraw Standards Committee (LSC) has added Appendix I to the LDraw parts header format to cover the options available to the !LDRAW ORG meta-command Please see Appendix I of the (URL) parts header format> for full details. --William Howard (...) (19 years ago, 29-Sep-06, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Door 1 x 4 x 6 with 3 Panes with color X Glass
|
|
(...) Not exactly. If Peeron shows a 'real' number for a part, we'll sure use it in creating an LDraw part file. But when the 'real' number is unknown, LDraw.org and Peeron each maintain their own set of xNNN numbers (except I think Peeron is in the (...) (19 years ago, 29-Sep-06, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Door 1 x 4 x 6 with 3 Panes with color X Glass
|
|
(...) I thougt Peeron was accurate and that we name our parts like Peeron? (19 years ago, 29-Sep-06, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | RE: Door 1 x 4 x 6 with 3 Panes with color X Glass
|
|
(URL) Message----- From: news-gateway@lugnet.com [mailto:news-gateway...ugnet.com] On Behalf Of Jaco van der Molen Sent: 28 September 2006 19:26 To: lugnet.cad.dat.parts@lugnet.com Subject: Door 1 x 4 x 6 with 3 Panes with color X Glass Hi there, (...) (19 years ago, 28-Sep-06, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Door 1 x 4 x 6 with 3 Panes with color X Glass
|
|
Hi there, Though the part 'Door 1 x 4 x 6 Frame' (30179) (URL) has been made, the 'Door 1 x 4 x 6 with 3 Panes with color X Glass' (x39c0X) is not, or is it? Has anyone made this one? See example trans light blue glass: (URL) (19 years ago, 28-Sep-06, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Minifig Food Cherry
|
|
Hi there, Has anyone ever made or mocked this part? (URL) (19 years ago, 24-Sep-06, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | NXT parts update
|
|
Hi. Finally I designed the missing front part of NXT US sensor (56467c01)! you can find the complete part in Ldraw's parts tracker. Also, I added the back sensor surface (55816) and fixed some holes in NXT motor shaft. Hope you like that. Danny (19 years ago, 17-Sep-06, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New parts header format validated by the LSC
|
|
(...) A shortcut is a file that provides an alias, a second number, for a part. Some shortcuts also specify the particular color (or colors) to use in a part. One classic example of a shortcut is part 30065.dat (even though its LDRAW_ORG line (...) (19 years ago, 15-Sep-06, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: New parts header format validated by the LSC
|
|
Hello, (...) Thanks for the information! I will use this syntax then. What exactly is a "shortcut"? I'm still trying to write a parts editor and now I implemented the new part header system in the program. I hope it won't change again! Leg Godt- (...) (19 years ago, 15-Sep-06, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: New parts header format validated by the LSC
|
|
(...) I would like to amend the Parts Tracker so that authors would not need to worry about this and the submit process would standardise this line. Chris (19 years ago, 15-Sep-06, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: New parts header format validated by the LSC
|
|
(...) the LSC hasn't voted on this issue yet and dropped the argument during discussion to speed up the voting on the actual header (which was a wise approach). anyway, the proposal is as following: 0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Part| Unofficial_Subpart| (...) (19 years ago, 14-Sep-06, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: New parts header format validated by the LSC
|
|
Hi Travis, how does this command line look like in unofficial parts (files I submit on the parts tracker)? 0 !LDRAW_ORG Part|Subpart|Primiti...e|Shortcut UPDATE YYYY-RR is it still the old 0 Type: Unofficial Element|Primitive|... line? And what kind (...) (19 years ago, 14-Sep-06, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
