 | | Re: Problem with click hinge part(s)?
|
|
(...) without measuring, just by sight, I'd say the 1x2 is the incorrect one, it's lugs should be moved up to match the 1x4 ROSCO (20 years ago, 6-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Problem with click hinge part(s)?
|
|
(...) Actually its the other way about. 30387 is wrong. More accurately, the subpart s/30387s01.dat does not match the guidance notes in p/clh1 and p/clh4. 0 // Placement on side of bricks; rotate accordingly, 0 // place on side 10 Ldu below top (...) (20 years ago, 9-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Problem with click hinge part(s)?
|
|
(...) my click hinges, and the lugs are ALL closer to the top of vertical end wall than the bottom. The position of the lug in your new version is definitely incorrect. Whether thats a problem with the primitive or the sub-part I don't know, but it (...) (20 years ago, 10-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Problem with click hinge part(s)? [DAT]
|
|
(...) We are both partially right - but there is a generic problem with these parts. The important dimension is the position of the axis of rotation of the click hinge, relative to the brick. For the geometry to work this must be the same distance (...) (20 years ago, 20-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Problem with click hinge part(s)?
|
|
(...) <SNIP> (...) New versions of the 1x4 parts are on the PT now (URL) please, before I apply the same changes to the other parts. Chris (20 years ago, 20-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Problem with click hinge part(s)?
|
|
(...) Yep Chris, taking into account the curves where the lugs join the brick, I'd say it's darn good now, thanks! ROSCO (20 years ago, 21-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Problem with click hinge part(s)?
|
|
(...) Thanks. New versions of the other official click hinge bricks are now on the Parts Tracker (URL) (20 years ago, 18-Jul-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
