 | | Re: Problems with new part and S\3069BS01.DAT —Karl Asha
|
| | | In my problem description I didn't mention that I had actually included the part in an mlcad model, so effectively it was created as a Type 1 line. The solution to the problem though seems to have been removing the part from the ldraw models (...) (22 years ago, 2-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Problems with new part and S\3069BS01.DAT —Orion Pobursky
|
| | | | (...) Hmmm... Lars will have to give conformation of this but I think L3P was handling your part as a submodel. That would explain why the tile subpart was shrunk when it was in any other directory but the parts directory -Orion (22 years ago, 2-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Problems with new part and S\3069BS01.DAT —Lars C. Hassing
|
| | | | (...) Confirmed! Well spotted. Any non-scaling reference to a part is shrunk, except if the reference is from a part. A part is currently defined as a file located in PARTS. "s\3069bs01.dat" (as a path) is located in PARTS. When the new part was in (...) (22 years ago, 3-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Problems with new part and S\3069BS01.DAT —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | | (...) text, so it's at least available on the website. Steve (22 years ago, 5-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Problems with new part and S\3069BS01.DAT —Karl Asha
|
| | | | Wanting to confirm one other thing. Is it intentional that a .ldr file with the same name as a part will not actually be procssed and result in a .pov file with only the part? In this case, I was constructing set 4532 and found a pov file with just (...) (22 years ago, 6-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| | | | |
