Subject:
|
Re: Orientation of train tracks
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dat.parts
|
Date:
|
Wed, 16 Oct 2002 20:56:57 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1070 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Tore Eriksson writes:
> I regret that I made the first straight track along the x axis and not the z.
> It seems I set the standard...
>
> Now that I try to make the switch (4.5 v blue), should I keep this
> unfortunate standard along the x axis or should I make this one correct?
Can you use a movedto to fix the other one? What is the 9v orientation? It
would be nice if everything was compatible...
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Orientation of train tracks
|
| (...) All tracks, including monorail are along the x axis :o( All sleepers and the power connector are along the z axis. :o) Movedto can be used to fix all tracks, but it's not the original intension of movedto. I guess we have to live with it. The (...) (22 years ago, 16-Oct-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
| | | Re: Orientation of train tracks
|
| (...) Moving parts requires using a different number. Which is possible if we aren't parked on a 'real' part number, but are using a 3DN (three digit number). But it's not possible if a part is already on the right number. (...) The 9V tracks (...) (22 years ago, 18-Oct-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Orientation of train tracks
|
| I regret that I made the first straight track along the x axis and not the z. It seems I set the standard... Now that I try to make the switch (4.5 v blue), should I keep this unfortunate standard along the x axis or should I make this one correct? (...) (22 years ago, 16-Oct-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
11 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
