 | | Re: New Part: x727 - Trailer 4 x 16 Ramp
|
|
(...) IIRC, part of what I did to these was to add the type 2 line inside the thin pattern rectangles and subjugate the pattern to subfile. These are techniques that proboably did not exist when you made the original part, so there is absolutely no (...) (22 years ago, 28-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: x727 - Trailer 4 x 16 Ramp
|
|
(...) Hmm. I'm not sure. My first thought is "honorary reviewers" or "era specialists". If you know of people who've got the parts in question, and they are willing to spend some time reviewing them, we can certainly take their input. Even if they (...) (22 years ago, 29-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: x727 - Trailer 4 x 16 Ramp
|
|
(...) Yes - that would be good. (...) alphabetic. (...) Yep - that would be good even better. (...) (22 years ago, 29-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: x727 - Trailer 4 x 16 Ramp
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Chris Dee writes: ( (URL) ) (...) I don't feel bad about improvements made to my old files. That's not my point. But I feel worse and worse about my parts submitted back in March 2002: <Long background> In (...) (22 years ago, 1-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: x727 - Trailer 4 x 16 Ramp
|
|
(...) A problem there is that, looking at the list, many of the parts are rare or ``vintage''. For example, I've been looking at this part recently (URL) a newer version appears in set 4164 (URL) part number 3888). I've been surprised at all the (...) (22 years ago, 2-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
