 | | Part x176
|
| I'm working on this part (URL) and hve the problem that it has 12 spokes, so it's hard to join it up with 16 segment cylinder primitives. I though maybe I could use the 48 segment primitives, but was wondering what people think - whether I should do (...) (23 years ago, 28-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
| | | | | Re: Part x176
|
| (...) yea rosco, try this > (URL) (23 years ago, 28-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
| | | | | Re: Part x176 [DAT]
|
| (...) Anyway, here's an updated version, that I'll upload to the PT tonight. I just tidied it up a bit, and changed the name & description to match peeron. It looks OK with the 16 seg cylinders, so I'll leave it as is. ROSCO 0 Wheel Centre Thin with (...) (23 years ago, 28-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
| | | | | Re: Part x176
|
| (...) Hey Ross: sorry I didn't really get the point of your email -- I was in a rush, and didn't look at the parts. Otherwise, I would have said then, what I'm going to say now. Do *not* use the Peeron 'x' numbers as the basis for LDraw parts! The (...) (23 years ago, 29-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
| | | | | Re: Part x176
|
| (...) Is there any reason an "x" number cannot co-exist with a matching "real" number? Surely, if the correct number is subsequently obtained, the "xnnn" can be changed to a "moved-to" stub. Is this just to avoid confusion? (...) OK. Ta. ROSCO (23 years ago, 30-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
| | | | | Re: Part x176
|
| (...) The "x" is a temporary prefix, indicating that it's a new part for which we don't know the real part number. If we don't find the real number before the new file is made official, the "x" is dropped. There's no point in having an "xnnn" number (...) (23 years ago, 30-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
| | | | | Re: Part x176
|
| (...) Just tried, Steve, and x124 is now used by a minifig shield. Could you reserve a block of 10 & email me? Thanks ROSCO (23 years ago, 3-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
| | | | | Re: Part x176
|
| (...) Argh! This is what comes of trying to run a world-wide subversive network single-handedly! Err, strike that. That was for some other newsgroups. Sorry about the bad suggestion. Your block of numbers is in the email. Steve (23 years ago, 3-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
| | | | | Re: Part x176
|
| (...) Shhhh! We don't [buy] want the masses to realise [more] that ldraw.org is really a [technic] front for a fearfully powerful [lego] money-making machine! (...) Well done! I don't think they suspect anything at all, do you? FUT: .o-t.fun ROSCO (23 years ago, 3-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| |
