Subject:
|
Re: New Part - 2587 Knights Armor
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dat.parts
|
Date:
|
Thu, 28 Mar 2002 10:45:47 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1540 times
|
| |
|
|
"Chris Dee" <chris_w_dee@hotmail.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:GtnGow.LJJ@lugnet.com...
>
> I tried this with real parts and find that there is a conflict in real life.
>
> If I put the head on the torso+armour first then add the helmet then the chin
> strap does not go as far below the grin as when I put the helmet on the head
> alone.
>
> If I put the helmet on the head, add the combo to the torso+armour it is the
> chin strap of the helmet which touches first. IfI then _carefully_ remove the
> helmet, I see than the head is not flush against the armour.
>
> The difference in both cases is around 2LDu. If I take your example above and
> shift the helmet up to 0 -29 0 then I no longer see the overlap.
>
> I am quite willing to accept that there may be a problem with the helmet (a new
> version on the PT corrects the ugly gaps at the rear), but I believe that this
> is a genuine case where the real parts do not fit as well as they might.
>
> Can anyone else confirm my observations ?
You are right, there is a difference. I would say that we could life with that.
The head should be at -28 an the helmet at -29 LDU, so the difference isn't to big.
CU Bernd
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: New Part - 2587 Knights Armor
|
| (...) I tried this with real parts and find that there is a conflict in real life. If I put the head on the torso+armour first then add the helmet then the chin strap does not go as far below the grin as when I put the helmet on the head alone. If I (...) (22 years ago, 27-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
4 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
