 | | Re: New Part: 3001_d.dat - Duplo Brick 2 x 4
|
|
(...) Strange. I named the Scala stud to Stud5.dat, but someone renamed it to StudSc.dat. So I thought StudDu*.dat would follow that new pattern... Please note that there are solid Duplo studs on some Duplo baseplates, even though the most common (...) (24 years ago, 5-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: 3001_d.dat - Duplo Brick 2 x 4
|
|
(...) I hope that 'someone' wasn't me! (...) In my clean, no local modifications installation of the LDraw Parts Library, the scala stud file is stud5.dat. (...) Yep, I almost posted that those needed to be done, but then I realized that they could (...) (24 years ago, 5-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Updated (again) Part: 3011.dat - Duplo Brick 2 x 4 & discussion [DAT]
|
|
(...) I too have stud5.dat as the Scala stud. As I further cleaned up the 2x2 and 2x4, something else jumped out at me that I hadn't seen before because the part was further off in other areas. Tore's top stud looked good to me at first, but then as (...) (24 years ago, 5-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: 3001_d.dat - Duplo Brick 2 x 4 [DAT]
|
|
(...) Sorry, my mistake. I think someone suggested the change, and I must have taken it for an official decision. I have no idea who suggeted the name change, only that I didn't like it then, and I don't like it now. My 33062 looks like this: 0 (...) (24 years ago, 5-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: 3001_d.dat - Duplo Brick 2 x 4
|
|
(...) Ah, I forgot about primitive substitution. For that reason, we probably should have a special primitive for Duplo studs (as you previously did), not a scaled-up stud4.dat as I suggested (and as I used in my recent Duplo parts). On the specific (...) (24 years ago, 5-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
