 | | new part 2865.dat (9v straight track) —Ludo Soete
|
| | | Hi, This is my verry first part i create. I do hope that it doesn't contain too many errors. Anyhow, feel free to give me feedback. I do have to learn a lot. regards, Ludo 0 9V straight train track 0 Name: 2865.dat 0 Author: Ludo Soete (...) (24 years ago, 20-Aug-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: new part 2865.dat (9v straight track) —Jonathan Wilson
|
| | | | | 2 things about this part: 1.you should make some of the bits of this part that are likely to be used in other parts subparts, i.e. the ties, including the one with the hole in it and the half tie that is used for the connection. and 2.the color you (...) (24 years ago, 20-Aug-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: new part 2865.dat (9v straight track) —Tore Eriksson
|
| | | | | | | (...) Ludo used: 0 electric piece 4 494 -46.50 -11 -147 -46.50 -11 168 -46.50 -16 168 -46.50 -16 -147 LDraw FAQ says: Electrical contacts LDraw: 494 (yellow) RGB: 204 204 204 (chrome) In other words: Right on target. /Tore -- Tore Eriksson Sweden (...) (24 years ago, 20-Aug-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: new part 2865.dat (9v straight track) —Ludo Soete
|
| | | | | | (...) Hi Jonathan, Thanks for the message. I don't think that the mentioned 'sub parts' could be used in other parts. I can only think on the curved track & the point. Reading the messages on following link : (URL) me that i rather keep the file as (...) (24 years ago, 24-Aug-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: new part 2865.dat (9v straight track) —Manfred Moolhuysen
|
| | | | | (...) I'm quite impressed, that is a rather ambitious choice for a first part. And not bad at all, although I have some remarks, the part looks relativly good already. So here we go: A. Orientation Parts that show a prominent length, should be (...) (24 years ago, 27-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: new part 2865.dat (9v straight track) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) In one of your replies in the thread you say you were hoping more people looked at it... well I looked at it and let me tell you, I am very excited to see this part. I am no part expert. I cannot give you any feedback on what is right or wrong (...) (24 years ago, 27-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| | | | |
