 | | Re: Search for 49668.dat (Plate 1x2 Tooth)
|
|
(...) It's in the official library - (URL) (15 years ago, 21-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Search for 49668.dat (Plate 1x2 Tooth)
|
|
(...) in the official library or the parts tracker? ROSCO (15 years ago, 21-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Open cylinder primitives, any demand?
|
|
(...) Here is a list I compiled of many parts that could make use of a cylinder that's open at both ends. There may be more. 6029A 3957 104 2569 30322 30209 3062B 33286 43888 4740 3960s01 3961s01 6942 75535 6177s01 30148 4360 4341 70501 529 6260 (...) (15 years ago, 17-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Technic Shock Absorber 6.5L
|
|
Hello all, How likely is it this (reworked) part will be in the next (<6mnts or so) official library? Cause I'm working on realtime spring generation in my LD4DStudio project and would really like to include a sample using these (classic) shocks (...) (15 years ago, 12-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Request part 31367 (Duplo Container Egg Base)
|
|
Hello all, Is there a parts author in posession of the part who can author it? Duplo Container Egg Base (URL) Bliss did a wonderful job for me years ago creating the top of the egg ((URL) that never made it to parts tracker (could be submitted (...) (15 years ago, 5-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Open cylinder primitives, any demand?
|
|
(...) This type of primitive would mostly be used in places where a cylinder appears between two other objects. One example would be the subpart at: (URL) currently uses 4-4cylc.dat where a 4-4cylo.dat (cylinder with edges open at both ends) would (...) (15 years ago, 3-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: Open cylinder primitives, any demand?
|
|
(...) Guess I replied way too soon. I may revise my earlier reply after giving it some more thought. A 1/4 cylinder with both ends closed would of course be better for rounded cornerns. A cylinder with both ends open could be useful when making (...) (15 years ago, 3-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: Open cylinder primitives, any demand?
|
|
(...) 4-4 and 2-4 cylc are released, 1-4 and 3-4cylc are already on PT. (...) I think the usefulness is quite low indeed. Philo (15 years ago, 3-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: Open cylinder primitives, any demand?
|
|
(...) A cylinder with one closed end (4-4cylc.dat) was issued in the latest parts update (2009-02). See (URL) . If there is a need for a 1-4cylc.dat, feel free to submit it to the Parts Tracker. However, I'm struggling to see the utility of a (...) (15 years ago, 2-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: Open cylinder primitives, any demand?
|
|
(...) Naming is not an important issue to me. Either name would be fine for me. The one important thing for me is that it doesn't mess up with renderers and utilities that make primitive substitutions. But I don't see that there should be any risk (...) (15 years ago, 2-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic ball joint socket naming
|
|
(...) Seems OK to me, but I don't like "circular" too much. Rounded, perhaps? Philo (15 years ago, 2-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic ball joint socket naming
|
|
(...) Hmm.. maybe I should really think another three dozen times more about what I propose. 32174.dat - Technic Ball Socket Single 3 x 2 Circular 47296.dat - Technic Ball Socket Single 3 x 2 Rectangular 47296.dat - Technic Ball Socket Double 5 x 2 (...) (15 years ago, 2-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Open cylinder primitives, any demand?
|
|
(...) Not being a part author, I can't comment on the utility, but to me the naming is confusing. The base cylinder primitives are already open at both ends; they just don't have edges there. So to me, cyle would make more since in the filename, and (...) (15 years ago, 2-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic ball joint socket naming
|
|
(...) I think it's a bad idea to have the double-socket parts be named so similarly to the single-socket parts. The double-socket parts are beams with sockets on either end, whereas the single socket parts are sockets with connectors out the (...) (15 years ago, 2-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Technic ball joint socket naming
|
|
(URL) Hi all - I'm currently working on the rectangular ball joint sockets and the naming issue (which I have tried to rise up a couple of times) is to me becoming a little critical. What I'd like is to unify the titles of all seven variants: the (...) (15 years ago, 2-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Open cylinder primitives, any demand? [DAT]
|
|
Is there any demand for this type of cylinder primitive that's open at both ends? 0 Cylinder open 1.0 0 Name: 4-4cylo.dat 0 Author: Mark Kennedy [mkennedy] 0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Primitive 0 !LICENSE Redistributable under CCAL version 2.0 : see (...) (15 years ago, 1-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: sticker with the shape in use (formed)
|
|
(...) Ah, basically the infamous texture mapping... I've seen a POC applied to LDRAW, and it's quite impressive. It'd be nice if we could move forward on that issue. Creating decorated parts the way it's done now is onerous to the extreme, IMHO. -- (...) (15 years ago, 31-Oct-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: sticker with the shape in use (formed)
|
|
(...) Of course, it would be most awesome to have a single part that could assume either configuration. But that is outside the scope of LDraw... Steve (15 years ago, 30-Oct-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: sticker with the shape in use (formed)
|
|
(...) The flat version can be applied on other bricks, or be used for bill of materials... Philo (15 years ago, 30-Oct-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | sticker with the shape in use (formed)
|
|
At part (URL) there is mentioned a hint that this number should be used for the plain version of the sticker an 56711gc01.dat for the formed version. On first sight this seemed logical to me. On the second sight I wonder why we should make also a (...) (15 years ago, 30-Oct-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
