 | | Ninja Minifig parts posted to Parts Tracker
|
|
Hello, I wanted to let you all know I have receintly posted a few "new" parts to the Parts Tracker. The names are not set in stone yet, but I have tried to keep them grouped with other like items. I would appreciate some suggestions on keywords for (...) (21 years ago, 16-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Technic Fig Parts and Orientation (Was: Connect7.dat)
|
|
(...) Oh, I missed that thread, since I included the keyword 'Action' in my search. :) My point of view is animation, but I think a generator's view is quite similar. I've read somewhere that the main object in animating a human or humaniod is the (...) (21 years ago, 15-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: Is this name free? Connect7.dat - Technic Pin Fake
|
|
(...) OK - let's keep in touch regarding this, to avoid duplicating effort. My progress (as mentioned in (URL) is with the regular arm and torso parts - although the mech-arms from the competition sets look fun. I'll resurrect my efforts and post an (...) (21 years ago, 15-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: Is this name free? Connect7.dat - Technic Pin Fake [DAT]
|
|
(...) I suspect it is used in more parts, but the parts I work on is 2709.dat* Technic Action Figure Lower Leg as well as the upper leg parts. *) according to (URL) but my part has # 2704 It wouldn't surprise me if the file really is BFC certified, (...) (21 years ago, 15-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: Is this name free? Connect7.dat - Technic Pin Fake
|
|
(...) Yes - this is free, and I think it makes sense to group this with the "real" Technic connectors. We really _would_ like all new primitives to be BFC CERTIFIED, though. Where is this fake pin used? Chris (21 years ago, 15-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Is this name free? Connect7.dat - Technic Pin Fake [DAT]
|
|
0 Technic Pin Fake 0 Name: connect7.dat 0 Author: Tore Eriksson 0 BFC NOCERTIFY 0 2 1 5.801 0 1 5.543 0 2.296 0 2 1 5.543 0 2.296 4.243 0 4.243 0 2 24 4.243 0 4.243 2.296 0 5.543 0 2 24 2.296 0 5.543 0 0 6 0 2 24 0 0 6 -2.296 0 5.543 0 2 24 -2.296 0 (...) (21 years ago, 14-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: POLICE Pattern (was Re: door 1 x 3 x 1 new patterns and errors in parts on PT)
|
|
(...) I think the O could be done with overlapping rings (and roughly 3/4 of the C), now that I think about it (I may try it before converting everything over to quads). But considering the C cannot be done without using quads, it may look odd that (...) (21 years ago, 14-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: POLICE Pattern (was Re: door 1 x 3 x 1 new patterns and errors in parts on PT)
|
|
(...) Me, too. But there aint no rings with a x-radius-difference of 1 and z-radius-difference of 1.125. Or you need to have overlapping rings. Even using ndis, segm (chord) primitives and triangles filling up is not possible, because the outer (...) (21 years ago, 14-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts - Aquanauts Door and Door Frame
|
|
(...) wrote: (...) Aquanaut Door (...) (URL) and here (...) (URL) (...) parts last week when I added pictures (...) reference, the (...) x 8 x 12 (...) capital letters in address for direct reply. You are right. Today they have names as you said. (...) (21 years ago, 13-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: POLICE Pattern (was Re: door 1 x 3 x 1 new patterns and errors in parts on PT)
|
|
(...) Personaly I'd suggest using ring primitives on the letters O and C to save space. (21 years ago, 13-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
