 | | Re: Modelise inner details or use more standard primitives ?
|
|
(...) I think having the interior open would be a good thing for this part. However, we're rapidly approaching 1000 files backlogged on the Tracker. So I'm getting more willing to let stuff through that can be improved later. Steve (22 years ago, 22-Feb-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Modelise inner details or use more standard primitives ?
|
|
(...) There was this unofficial generic rule that details smaller than 1 LDU may be omitted. I don't know if it is still valid. Another good rule, always valid, is common sense... :o) /Tore (22 years ago, 22-Feb-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Modelise inner details or use more standard primitives ?
|
|
I have a problem with the part Technic Pneumatic T Piece (URL) have two options - modelling a very accurate part, with inner details, but for this would produce a part with less standard primitives cylinder or sphere. - using as many as possible (...) (22 years ago, 22-Feb-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Naming of springs parts
|
|
I have modelised a the pneumatic pump. I have created two complete assemblies in two different positions. This part has a spring, so I have created two springs with different extensions. I have names these parts 2797s01 and 2797s02. OrionP, the (...) (22 years ago, 21-Feb-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Minifig tool axe
|
|
Chris Dee <chris_w_dee@hotmail.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:HAKr04.I7v@lugnet.com... (...) Thanks. CU Bernd (22 years ago, 20-Feb-03, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
