 | | Re: New Part: x727 - Trailer 4 x 16 Ramp
|
|
(...) Yes - that would be good. (...) alphabetic. (...) Yep - that would be good even better. (...) (22 years ago, 29-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: x727 - Trailer 4 x 16 Ramp
|
|
(...) Mail me a list of the old parts you mean, and I'll see what I can do. I can't promise a quick response, but I bet that I can find one of just about anything around here. I have a friend in the area who is a very serious collecter of old stuff. (...) (22 years ago, 29-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: x727 - Trailer 4 x 16 Ramp
|
|
(...) Hmm. I'm not sure. My first thought is "honorary reviewers" or "era specialists". If you know of people who've got the parts in question, and they are willing to spend some time reviewing them, we can certainly take their input. Even if they (...) (22 years ago, 29-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: x727 - Trailer 4 x 16 Ramp
|
|
(...) FWIW, I didn't take your response to Don as childish. You brought up a very valid point. Some responses to your parts that have been "improved" by others: (...) I believe the same thing happened to *all* 3070 parts. The file was not updated (...) (22 years ago, 29-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Work-in-progress improved minifig arm
|
|
(...) Yes it is, because at the monkey you can see it. (...) CU Bernd (22 years ago, 29-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Part x176
|
|
(...) Hey Ross: sorry I didn't really get the point of your email -- I was in a rush, and didn't look at the parts. Otherwise, I would have said then, what I'm going to say now. Do *not* use the Peeron 'x' numbers as the basis for LDraw parts! The (...) (22 years ago, 29-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Firelogo
|
|
(...) Yes, it would be better if the firelogo was a subpart, so it could be reused. The main problem with 4209p01 is it is coded poorly. As you said, the pattern is setup like a sticker. The files should be modified - the printed area should be (...) (22 years ago, 29-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Work-in-progress improved minifig arm
|
|
(...) This looks very promising! :) Any chance you're going to recurve the inner surface around the shoulder? It would really help avoid that "CGI intersecting solids" look that we've had going. :) Also, can I reserve judgement as to whether we (...) (22 years ago, 29-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Work-in-progress improved minifig arm
|
|
Congratulations Chris, This is a tremendous improvement. I wonder whether interior is really necessary. Personally I would be satisfied with a better-than-current exterior. May be the cost in display time is negligeable compared to a whole minifig. (...) (22 years ago, 28-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Work-in-progress improved minifig arm [DAT]
|
|
(...) Repost to fix line-wrapping mess. 0 FILE armtest.dat 0 Name: armtest.DAT 0 Author: Chris Dee (chris_w_dee@hotmail.com) 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 973.DAT 0 rotated 9.782 z 1 15 -15.552 9 0 .9855 -.1699 0 .1699 .9855 0 0 0 1 975b.dat 0 rotated (...) (22 years ago, 28-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
