 | | Re: minifig crossbow
|
|
Jonathan, you have improved very much. I never would have guessed this piece to be done by you if someone had just 'laid it in front of me'. Good job. I only noticed two mistakes that should be fairly easy to correct 1. The handle is too far (...) (25 years ago, 31-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Unofficial part: Technic Connector Half [DAT]
|
|
0 Hi, this part is probably quite rare in the US yet, having appeared 0 mostly in European sets so far. It is however appearing in 8445. 0 0 Nevertheless, I would be happy if you could take a look at it and 0 report any flaws you can see. 0 0 Also, (...) (25 years ago, 31-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: minifig crossbow
|
|
the part as posted has an error in it. there are some parts that are color #7 instead of color #16. i am aware of this and have fixed the part. (25 years ago, 31-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | minifig crossbow [DAT]
|
|
here is the minifig crossbow. 0 Minifig Crossbow 0 Author: Jonathan Wilson 0 Author: Adam Howard (ring on front) 0 Name: 2570.dat 0 Unofficial Element 3 16 4 -1 0 -4 -1 0 0 -1 -6 3 16 4 1 0 -4 1 0 0 1 -6 4 16 4 4 18 4 4 0 -4 4 0 -4 4 18 4 16 4 0 18 (...) (25 years ago, 31-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Part number needed & New primitive submission
|
|
(...) Just so y'all know, I haven't heard back from Mindspring, Jacob, or Nordu.net in quite a few days. It appears there remains a problem :( -Tim <>< (URL) timcourtne ICQ: 23951114 Get paid to surf the web! Visit: (URL) (25 years ago, 30-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Part number needed & New primitive submission
|
|
Steve Bliss <blisses@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message news:379efb57.879462...net.com... (...) to (...) I have rethought my original decision on both of these. I realize the end quads will never be seen, but is that a reason to create a new (...) (25 years ago, 30-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Part number needed & New primitive submission
|
|
Thought experiment was very convincing. I'll redo the part so that the axis of rotation is around the x axis (I'll check the orientation of 30044 first to make sure the axis is correct). This way you'll only have to move the part in the y direction (...) (25 years ago, 30-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Part number needed & New primitive submission
|
|
Hi Chris, Thanks for the link, unfortunately my ISP is Mindspring and I have never been able to link to ldraw.org. Tim is working on solving the problem. Could you send me a copy though. Thanks, Adam (...) from (...) the (...) (25 years ago, 30-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Part number needed & New primitive submission
|
|
[followups set to lugnet.cad.dev] (...) Looks like box.dat is the only one based on a 2x2x2 cube, all the other box*.dat primitives are 2x1x2, Y[0,1]. So this new primitive should be written the same way. (...) Clear naming would be nice, but we (...) (25 years ago, 30-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Part number needed & New primitive submission
|
|
[followups set to lugnet.cad.dev - let's reign in this multi-ng discussion] (...) See my other post. The A key is very nice, it saves 5 keystrokes. But it isn't a reason to create a part in a bizarre orientation. Steve (25 years ago, 30-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
