|
|
 | | Re: 6002, similar to 6909?
|
| (...) I haven't seen this part yet, but I have 6059 which is a 3 x 3 x 6 round panel with a spherous top. the problem I discovered was that the top part wasn't a true sphere so I would not be able to use the sphere primitives and the file size would (...) (23 years ago, 13-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
| | | | | 6002, similar to 6909?
|
| Don and Mark, I recently aquired partn number 6909 which is a 4 x 4 x 6 (?) Round Panel with Spherous Top. I can't help but notice how similar it is to 6002 and was wondering if you two were going to try to make that part also. I tried a little, but (...) (23 years ago, 13-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
| | | | | Re: 30086 (and 30087) 'Rubber' Dinghy
|
| (...) I had this same problem when I first put this mpd in my /parts directory. Apparently, MLCad does not like mpd files in the /parts directory. I had to separate the mpd into its subparts. Since I'm more picky than some, I put all the subparts (...) (23 years ago, 12-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
| | | | | Part Authoring FAQ (was Re:Some submission guidelines...)
|
| (...) Oops, sorry about that. Really all this info should be added to the FAQ on www.ldraw.org. All the FAQ says about submitting is "When you have finished the part, you should check it for technical mistakes with l3p -check, and then send it to (...) (23 years ago, 11-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Some submission guidelines (was: Re: 6002 mpd version, now I think I got it.)
|
| In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Don Heyse wrote something that triggered me to write at length: (...) Posting to lugnet.cad.dat.parts as an MPD is cool. It's better than the alternative (posting several messages, possibly pointing links to (...) (23 years ago, 10-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
|
