 | | Re: MOC: Apollo lunar module (repost) —Jeremy H. Sproat
|
| | | (...) For some reason in LDLite, it only gets as far as the bottom of the base, at which point LDLite announces it's done. Bram and Jonathan, which viewers are you using? Anyway, Axel, I'm glad you posted a URL to the rendering. This model is (...) (25 years ago, 27-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: MOC: Apollo lunar module (repost) —Axel Poqué
|
| | | | | (...) For viewing the model as a whole I'd recommend l3lab (it's fast and it works), and of course for everything else ML-CAD (assuming you have a windows machine). WRT to my L3PAO problem, I just installed the up to date versions of everything I (...) (25 years ago, 27-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: MOC: Apollo lunar module (repost) —Jeremy H. Sproat
|
| | | | | | | (...) Hmmm. I wonder why L3Lab works where LDLite breaks. Cheers, - jsproat (25 years ago, 27-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: MOC: Apollo lunar module (repost) —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | | | | | (...) LDLite has always been slightly flakey on MPD files. I think v1.6 is better than v1.5, but I'm not in a position to make absolute statements--I use L3Lab these days. Steve (25 years ago, 27-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | LDLITE cache limit bug (Was Apollo lunar module) —Don Heyse
|
| | | | | | | | (...) at (...) works), (...) Yeah, this is a caching bug in the ldlite parser. I get the same problem in ldglite when I use the ldlite parser, but not with the L3 parser. I think it's because one of the caching structures is full before it gets (...) (25 years ago, 27-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: LDLITE cache limit bug (Was Apollo lunar module) —Paul Gyugyi
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Heh, um, I also use L3Lab nowadays, actually. :) LDLite v1.6 is better than 1.5 at MPD files. (...) [...] (...) You did it the right way. Actually, the log output should show warnings about files not being cached, although it does not mention (...) (25 years ago, 28-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: MOC: Apollo lunar module (repost) —Axel Poqué
|
| | | | | | | (...) I've tried with the current version and I get the same result. If I remove the the piece at which LDLite stops (a 3024, plate 1x1), it jumps to the next submodel (the ascent stage) and renders this, but only to a certain point also. No matter (...) (25 years ago, 27-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: MOC: Apollo lunar module (repost) —Axel Poqué
|
| | | | | | (...) I've tried with the current version and I get the same result. If I remove the the piece at which LDLite stops (a 3024, plate 1x1), it jumps to the next submodel (the ascent stage) and renders this, but only to a certain point also. No matter (...) (25 years ago, 27-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: MOC: Apollo lunar module (repost) —Bram Lambrecht
|
| | | | (...) L3Lab. Ldlite often has problems with big MPD files. --Bram Bram Lambrecht / o o \ BramL@juno.com ---...---oooo-----(_...o---...--- WWW: (URL) (25 years ago, 27-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: MOC: Apollo lunar module (repost) —Jeremy H. Sproat
|
| | | | (...) L3Lab workds great. Thanks all. :-, Gorgeous model. Cheers, - jsproat (25 years ago, 27-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| | | | |
