 | | Re: Stl2dat settings?
|
|
Hi, (...) for teps (EG. 0.1) when the coordinates in the stl file have to few decimals. (...) The -deps value controls if two triangles can be merged to a quad. This value is related to the -det option of l3p -check (...) The STL format produced by (...) (19 years ago, 9-Nov-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Stl2dat settings?
|
|
Hi folks, as a stl2dat toddler I'd like to know what kind of settings you use for the conversion with a spot on: -eps value (default 0.01) -teps value : minimum distance for coincidence (default 0.001) -deps value : maximum determinant for coplanar (...) (19 years ago, 9-Nov-07, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Stl2dat settings?
|
|
Hi folks, as a stl2dat toddler I'd like to know what kind of settings you use for the conversion with a spot on: -eps value (default 0.01) -teps value : minimum distance for coincidence (default 0.001) -deps value : maximum determinant for coplanar (...) (19 years ago, 9-Nov-07, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Non-fluo trans orange?
|
|
(...) You're right. My mistake. -Orion (19 years ago, 29-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Non-fluo trans orange?
|
|
(...) I don't know what LEGO color T182 is, but based on Philippe's title, I'm guessing it's the (relatively) new trans orange (non-fluorescent). Assuming this is the case, then color 57 isn't it. --Travis (19 years ago, 29-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Non-fluo trans orange?
|
|
(...) Per the ldconfig.ldr ((URL) file, color 57 is correct. -Orion (19 years ago, 29-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Part 2609b
|
|
Dean Earley schrieb: (...) Hi, the current 2609 should be renamed to 2609a. cu mikeheide (19 years ago, 29-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Part 2609b
|
|
Dean Earley schrieb: (...) Hi, maybe this (URL) helps. I only have one part and that has also a groove. On the pictures also only parts with groove are shown. So maybe it has always grooves. cu mikeheide (19 years ago, 29-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Part 2609b
|
|
(...) As I'm rewriting 2609 to make use of a load more primitives, is there a version of either of these without the groove? The current LDraw part doesn't but all my real pieces do. (19 years ago, 29-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Part 2609b
|
|
Hi all. I have a magnet holder labelled 2609 but is about 4 LDU taller than the current part. Shall I just submit it as 2609b and what needs to be done with the current 2609? Thanks (19 years ago, 29-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
