 | | Re: Click-Rotation Parts [DAT]
|
|
And here is the primitive: CU Bernd 0 Click Rotation Socket Cogwheel Quarter 0 Name: 1-4crs.dat 0 Author: Bernd Broich 0 Unofficial Primitive 0 BFC CERTIFY CW 0 Inner Ring R = 11 LDU 0 Outer Ring R = 12 LDU 0 Upper Ring 2 24 0 0 11.2 0.5 0 11.35 2 (...) (22 years ago, 26-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Click-Rotation Parts [DAT]
|
|
(...) Sorry but there is no finished part yet. (...) I could send you a nearly finished part (48169) where the bottom is open. But else it's finished. To Steve Bliss or Chris Dee: I've made the cylinder-thing with high-res- primitives because it was (...) (22 years ago, 26-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: "Clusters" of Studs?
|
|
(...) Yeah, they'd be just the studs. (...) I'm not opposed to that; I don't see a compelling choice between stug* and stus*. Because I had files that used them, I went ahead and submitted stug3, stug4, stug6 and stug8 to the PT. If people want (...) (22 years ago, 26-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: "Clusters" of Studs?
|
|
(...) Just to clarify, would these include the surface between the studs, or just the studs? I think logically they should include just the studs but just wanted to make sure. (...) Maybe, if that is a future possibility, the square ones should be (...) (22 years ago, 25-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: Click-Rotation Parts
|
|
(...) Are there any further news on the knight parts? I wanted to start building them and found this discussion. So it would be interesting how far the proceeding is come up to now. Michael Heidemann (mikeheide) (22 years ago, 25-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: 3036p01.dat - Plate 6 x 8 with Red Side
|
|
(...) There have to be more parts like this for the set 310. I tried to model it in MLCad, but this both parts are not enought. Also why is this part not on the parts tracker? I cant find it there Michael Heidemann (mikeheide) (22 years ago, 25-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: "Clusters" of Studs?
|
|
(...) ... Whoops; you're right. --Travis (22 years ago, 25-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: "Clusters" of Studs?
|
|
(...) From the way Steve explained it, it sounds like stug4 would be a 4x4 square, not a 2x2 square, in which case going from stugN to stugN+1 actually does give you another 2N+1 studs. When you think about it, by your reasoning, you'd never (...) (22 years ago, 25-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: "Clusters" of Studs?
|
|
Since I haven't authored any parts, I'm not going to go into this too deeply, but I think that square groups is a good idea. One minor note. Going from one group size to the next gives you 2 * sqrt(N) + 1 new studs, not 2N + 1. --Travis (22 years ago, 25-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: "Clusters" of Studs?
|
|
Steve, I say, "Go for it." ;) Franklin (22 years ago, 25-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
