 | | Re: Click-Rotation Parts [DAT]
|
| (...) Sorry but there is no finished part yet. (...) I could send you a nearly finished part (48169) where the bottom is open. But else it's finished. To Steve Bliss or Chris Dee: I've made the cylinder-thing with high-res- primitives because it was (...) (22 years ago, 26-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
| | | | | Re: "Clusters" of Studs?
|
| (...) Yeah, they'd be just the studs. (...) I'm not opposed to that; I don't see a compelling choice between stug* and stus*. Because I had files that used them, I went ahead and submitted stug3, stug4, stug6 and stug8 to the PT. If people want (...) (22 years ago, 26-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
| | | | | Re: "Clusters" of Studs?
|
| (...) Just to clarify, would these include the surface between the studs, or just the studs? I think logically they should include just the studs but just wanted to make sure. (...) Maybe, if that is a future possibility, the square ones should be (...) (22 years ago, 25-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
| | | | | Re: Click-Rotation Parts
|
| (...) Are there any further news on the knight parts? I wanted to start building them and found this discussion. So it would be interesting how far the proceeding is come up to now. Michael Heidemann (mikeheide) (22 years ago, 25-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
| | | | | Re: New Part: 3036p01.dat - Plate 6 x 8 with Red Side
|
| (...) There have to be more parts like this for the set 310. I tried to model it in MLCad, but this both parts are not enought. Also why is this part not on the parts tracker? I cant find it there Michael Heidemann (mikeheide) (22 years ago, 25-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
| | | | | Re: "Clusters" of Studs?
|
| (...) ... Whoops; you're right. --Travis (22 years ago, 25-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
| | | | | Re: "Clusters" of Studs?
|
| (...) From the way Steve explained it, it sounds like stug4 would be a 4x4 square, not a 2x2 square, in which case going from stugN to stugN+1 actually does give you another 2N+1 studs. When you think about it, by your reasoning, you'd never (...) (22 years ago, 25-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
| | | | | Re: "Clusters" of Studs?
|
| Since I haven't authored any parts, I'm not going to go into this too deeply, but I think that square groups is a good idea. One minor note. Going from one group size to the next gives you 2 * sqrt(N) + 1 new studs, not 2N + 1. --Travis (22 years ago, 25-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
| | | | | Re: "Clusters" of Studs?
|
| Steve, I say, "Go for it." ;) Franklin (22 years ago, 25-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
| | | | | Re: magnet.dat
|
| The first question: I don't have the older trainsets. Have LEGO magnets always been the same size? (I think they have) Unless they've changed in size, we should all be using the same size magnet in LDraw. You are correct, s\magnet.dat is both the (...) (22 years ago, 25-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
|
