 | | Re: Naming of parts
|
| (...) Then you'd just use "Plate 4 x 8 Without Corner Left" and "Plate 4 x 8 Without Corner Right" -Orion (23 years ago, 4-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
| | | | | Re: Naming of parts
|
| (...) If LEGO were to produce a rectangular plate, say a 4x8, with a missing corner, what would be a good way to describe it? The part could easily have a mirror-image part, so it wouldn't be enough to say "Plate 4 x 8 without corner," since that (...) (23 years ago, 4-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
| | | | | Re: Naming of parts
|
| (...) This one should be Wing 3 x 4 (...) These ones are plates with one corner clipped, I think the 'Without Corner' label is better than Wing. I'd like to add these ones to the list: 2621 2625 I had renamed 2625 while it was on the PT for BFC (...) (23 years ago, 4-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
| | | | | Re: Naming of parts
|
| (...) How about these two: 30033 Plate 2 x 2 with Rod Frame Octagonal (URL) 30094 Bar 4 x 4 with 4 Studs (No entry at LUGNet) I suggest changing the last to: 30094 Plate 2 x 2 with Rod Frame Rectangular Christian (23 years ago, 4-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Naming of parts
|
| (...) The following official parts do not follow this rule: 4859 32059 2401 2450 2419 30503 6106 (23 years ago, 3-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
|
