 | | Re: Dinosaur parts [DAT]
|
|
(...) I done it. Only the orientation could be a question. Steve please tell me a part-number for this. CU Bernd ---...--- 0 Animal Tail Section (Middle) with Pin 0 Name: Animal_Tail.dat 0 Author: Bernd Broich 0 Unofficial Part 0 KEYWORDS Dinosaur, (...) (23 years ago, 3-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Dinosaur parts
|
|
(...) I began the Tail Section with Pin. CU Bernd (23 years ago, 3-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Dinosaur parts
|
|
(...) The tail sections are in my to-do-bucket. But there are many, many parts with higher priority... /Tore (23 years ago, 2-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Why is the Thickness of Liftarms changing?
|
|
(...) Indeed but... too late now :-( (...) ...but using plates on side of liftarms can be very helpful to stiffen chassis built with them. Philo (23 years ago, 2-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Dinosaur parts
|
|
Hi all, is anybody working on these files? Animal Dinosaur Tail Section with Pin (URL) Dinosaur Tail Section End (URL) Dinosaur Head Small (URL) Bernd (23 years ago, 2-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Why is the Thickness of Liftarms changing?
|
|
(...) Thank you for this illustration. I see your point. These parts should have been originally modeled rotated 90 degrees around Z so that the liftarm "thickness" would have been the same a brick "width". I think I can safely say that I have (...) (23 years ago, 1-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Keyword in description missing
|
|
(...) I'll do it, but first I have to clean up this one: (URL) (23 years ago, 1-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Why is the Thickness of Liftarms changing?
|
|
(...) are several of these liftarms getting changed to 18LDU? (...) Liftarms are narrower than bricks, you don't even need a caliper to see it : (URL) ...and measured with a caliper : brick width: 7.8mm liftarm width: 7.4mm liftarm height: 7.8mm As (...) (23 years ago, 1-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Keyword in description missing
|
|
(...) I agree. And the Pattern should be rebuild. In the moment it is converted with bmp2dat and so it needs some time to load the part in the preview. Also it doesn't look fine when you zoom in. CU Bernd PS: I don't own the part, so I can't rebuild (...) (23 years ago, 1-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Keyword in description missing
|
|
While we are at it, I think part 3754P01.DAT Brick 1 x 6 x 5 with LL2079 Floating Astronaut Picture should be renamed to Brick 1 x 6 x 5 with LL2079 Floating Astronaut Pattern Jaco (23 years ago, 1-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Why is the Thickness of Liftarms changing?
|
|
(...) I confirm Pauls measurement. I compared it with a brick and it has the same thickness. This is also needed to connect a pin with the holes. CU Bernd (23 years ago, 1-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Why is the Thickness of Liftarms changing?
|
|
(...) What are you using to measure with? I use a dial caliper. Paul (23 years ago, 1-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: why I love subfiles...
|
|
(...) I'm going to have to agree with Tore on this one. Subfile are useful for repeated patterns and "without faces" parts, to me, your example seems to use subfiles uneccesarily. -Orion (23 years ago, 1-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.ideas)
|
| |
| | Re: Why is the Thickness of Liftarms changing?
|
|
(...) I've measured these and several others have as well and we all got 18 LDU -Orion (23 years ago, 1-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Why is the Thickness of Liftarms changing?
|
|
(...) Yes that seems strange, as far as I can tell all these liftarms are the same width as a 1xN brick, so should be modelled as 20LDU as the bricks are. ROSCO (23 years ago, 31-Dec-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Why is the Thickness of Liftarms changing?
|
|
This part is on the Part Tracker; (URL) 32278 I have has a thickness of .0309" which is approximately 19.77LDU. Why are several of these liftarms getting changed to 18LDU? Paul (23 years ago, 31-Dec-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Keyword in description missing
|
|
(...) OK - I'll make it so. Chris (23 years ago, 28-Dec-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Keyword in description missing
|
|
(...) I feel pretty strongly that the title for all patterned parts should end in the word Pattern. I would consider this enough of a reason to make the change. (...) Steve (23 years ago, 28-Dec-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: why I love subfiles...
|
|
(...) Sorry, I don't get the message at all. In the example you gave, I see no reason for sub-filing at all. On the contrary, to me it looks like a typical example of very unnecessary subfiling. Please be more specific why sub-filing would add (...) (23 years ago, 27-Dec-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.ideas)
|
| |
| | Re: Pat 44567 - Hinge Plate 1 x 2 Locking with 1 Finger On Side
|
|
(...) Thank for the cortribution Mark but I posted this part to the Parts Tracker a few months ago: (URL) (23 years ago, 27-Dec-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
