 | | Re: New part - Castle Wall
|
| (...) It's a little bit risky to make a part only from instruction scans. But never mind it's nearly correct. I'll send you a picture from the bottom. CU Bernd (23 years ago, 7-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
| | | | | New part - Castle Wall
|
| Dear All, I hit on an idea to build CAD model of Royal Knight's Castle from set 6090. In certain moment I found that one part from this set has been never created, so I decided to create it myself. It is a part 6055 named "Castle Wall 6 x 6 x 6 (...) (23 years ago, 7-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
| | | | | Re: WOULD YOU PLEASE...
|
| (...) I can understand you. But I think primitives with are used by a lot of parts should be available to change by anyone. In the other hand a _part_ (or subpart) should never changed if it's on the PT. CU Bernd (23 years ago, 7-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
| | | | | Re: Torus Primitives on the Part Tracker
|
| (...) Cool! (...) More cool! (...) the two related part files, neither of which is certified, I'd say go ahead and update t04q3333.dat. (...) Certainly. Steve (23 years ago, 6-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
| | | | | Re: WOULD YOU PLEASE...
|
| [crossposted to lugnet.cad.dev, with followup-to set there as well -- this thread isn't about posting LDR files to lugnet] (...) If anyone is not sure about the general rule/protocol/guidelines on this: for new parts (not fixes), you should *always* (...) (23 years ago, 6-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
|
