 | | Re: New Primitive Class
|
| (...) If we can only create outside sections,[1] why not keep the leading t, but change the i/o/q? Maybe x, for extended? As for the ratio decimals in the file name, instead of noting the tube:major ratio (which is >1), use the inverse major:tube (...) (23 years ago, 6-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
| | | | | Re: WOULD YOU PLEASE...
|
| (...) Woah, hold it there cowboy. The ONLY fix I will apply to a part not already submitted as a fix would be to slightly adjust the part position. I feel that small and minor errors can be fixed by anyone and would only fly off the handle (ok, I (...) (23 years ago, 6-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
| | | | | WOULD YOU PLEASE...
|
| ...yes, would you please ask PERMISSION before you mess up my code! Yes I'm angry, but I'm so sick! currently there is spreading a rude behaviour at the PT, especially by the reviewers. grabbing a part and fix an error before an author can get a (...) (23 years ago, 6-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
| | | | | Re: New Primitive Class
|
| (...) This topic still needs some approval before we nac move it to finalization. We have been discussing torii(toruses) where the tube radius is equal or greater than the major radius. This only works for the outside sections since the inside (...) (23 years ago, 4-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
| | | | | Torus Primitives on the Part Tracker
|
| Hello, I have been updating some of the torus primitve files to use quads, and conditional lines instead of cylinder primitves. I have had too many problems getting the cylinder files to show without gaps. I have a new tool that can generate any (...) (23 years ago, 4-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
|
