 | | PT File Checker Down
|
|
To whom it may concern: The File Check tool on Parts Tracker seems to be broken. When I hit the submit button, the tool resets itself (clears the file textbox and resets the part type to Parts). I tried several files in different categories and disk (...) (24 years ago, 1-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Darth Vader Helmet on Parts tracker
|
|
(...) Mine cost about $25.00 US. All you really need is precision to 1/64 inch since about 1/64 = 1 LDU -Orion (24 years ago, 1-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Darth Vader Helmet on Parts tracker
|
|
(...) I'm not in any rush to do so. I'm still gaining experience from doing more symmetrical parts. I can see that the Stormtrooper's helmet could take as long or longer than Vader's helmet. The Rebel helmet could be done in a much shorter time: (...) (24 years ago, 31-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: possible rendering problem with LDLite and transparent parts
|
|
(...) Ok, but I just tested flat.dat with ldlite 2.3 and your command line: ldlite.exe -W2 -MS -S3.0 -C15 -A0.707104,0,0.70710...-0.650895, 0.390731,0.650895 -D1 -U02500,02500 -I-4 -K flat.dat It worked just fine on Win2K with only 192MB. However, I (...) (24 years ago, 31-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.models, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: possible rendering problem with LDLite and transparent parts
|
|
(...) I am viewing them at full scale. It's related to the size of the work area, I'm pretty sure, rather than the resolution they're viewed at. 4000x4000 is a pretty good sized chunk of memory, I expect. Gyug sent me a note, he's looking into it. (24 years ago, 31-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
