 | | Re: Could someone tell me what this is? [DAT]
|
|
(...) And here they are. I named it Hinge Hook, but I'm not sure if this is the best name but it's a good one. LMK if the Orientation and Origin are wrong. CU Bernd ---...--- 0 Hinge Hook Base 0 Name: 2650.dat 0 Author: Bernd Broich 0 Unofficial (...) (24 years ago, 29-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: x345: Technic Flex System Ball Connector (closed)
|
|
(...) Bingo! Thanks Orion! Theres updated versions at (URL) (24 years ago, 28-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: x342: ~Technic Flex-System End
|
|
(...) OK. Updated BFC certified versions now available at (URL) (24 years ago, 28-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: x342: ~Technic Flex-System End
|
|
(...) I agree! "Cable" is much better. I knew that "Wire" was sub-optimal when I wrote the article, but I couldn't come up with a better word at the time. (...) Fredrik (24 years ago, 28-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: x345: Technic Flex System Ball Connector (closed)
|
|
(...) I'm a dummy. I overanalyzed the problem. Here's the solution: The BFC CERTFY statement dosen't have a CW or CCW. If add CW or CCW everything will show up as expected. You still have to fix the bad vertex sequences and row all 0 warnings (...) (24 years ago, 27-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
