 | | Re: Fixed New Part: x194.dat ( formerly known as: x192.dat - Minifig Shield Round)
|
|
(...) Dude -- it SO rocks! A cajillion thanks! I get closer and closer to a CAD Gherkin...all I need now are those new Alpha Team mecha arms (with ball hinges and technic style pins) and their 2x2x2 female socket counterpart bricks. Anyone working (...) (25 years ago, 5-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
 | | Fixed New Part: x194.dat ( formerly known as: x192.dat - Minifig Shield Round) [DAT]
|
|
here is the fixed and I hope unwrapped version of the minifig shield round. please notice that due to a request from ldraw.org the part number has changed from x192.dat to x194.dat I substituted the inlined stud with the stud2.dat primitive. (...) (25 years ago, 5-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
 | | Re: New Part: x192.dat - Minifig Shield Round
|
|
Willy: Might you post a "cleaner" version of this file? Without the wrapping lines... Thanks, Hop-Frog (25 years ago, 5-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
 | | Re: New Part: x192.dat - Minifig Shield Round
|
|
(...) Hmm. That would look a little weird, to have LEGO floating slightly above the surface. It wouldn't *really* be noticeable, but still... I'd be inclined to ignore the slight indentation, and model the part as if the inside was the same height (...) (25 years ago, 4-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
 | | Re: New Part: x192.dat - Minifig Shield Round
|
|
(...) Sorry for the mess, I'll fix my settings before I post my next part. Willy (25 years ago, 4-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
 | | Re: New Part: x192.dat - Minifig Shield Round
|
|
(...) I'm glad that you like it and get praise from a master author. Many thx. (...) primitive. Yes It does, but the problem is that I can't use a regular primitve 'cos the inner cylinder is 0,3 mm deeper than the cylinder on the outside. (...) (...) (25 years ago, 4-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
 | | Re: PT, part 2039 lamppost
|
|
(...) I did have some (offline, I believe) discussion with other authors at the time I made this, and came to the conclusion that this hole is not functional. Chris (25 years ago, 4-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
 | | PT, part 2039 lamppost
|
|
My two lampposts have small holes near the top, which aren't modelled in the current PT version (URL) They don't look like they're there (or big enough) for anything to be connected, so I'm not sure if they should be included in the part or not. (...) (25 years ago, 4-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
 | | Re: KEYWOROD Meta-Command
|
|
(...) Desired. Unless it would only include redundant words. It's assumed that any text in the part's descriptive title, CATEGORY, and file name (or anywhere in the header, really), would be considered useful for searches, and wouldn't need to be (...) (25 years ago, 4-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
 | | Re: KEYWOROD Meta-Command
|
|
(...) It's an optional meta-command. Not all parts need keywords. Hope this helps. Franklin (25 years ago, 3-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|