 | | Re: We should create a 973c01.dat —Chris Dee
|
| | | (...) Thanks for suggesting this. I think the hips+legs shortcut should be 970c01, as 970 is the hips part number (973 is the torso number). And yes, when I get the new arms and hands finished there should be a 973c01 torso+arms+hands shortcut. (...) (22 years ago, 28-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: We should create a 973c01.dat —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | (...) 973c01 should include a head, too. This is the way torsos (sp?) are pre-assembled by lego. Steve (22 years ago, 29-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: We should create a 973c01.dat —Erik Olson
|
| | | | I was just studying the minifig hips shortcut and had a thought. Would it have been a good idea or not to use a subfile for the "studs" on minifig hips? The question is really what justifies a subfile? I'm slowly making my bounding box code smarter, (...) (22 years ago, 27-Oct-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: We should create a 973c01.dat —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | (...) Hmm. It might make sense to make a stud primitive for the minifig hips studs. But probably not a subfile. OTOH, there's only one part that uses the minifig-hip-stud. So a primitive is not really justified. (...) Ah. Yes, I could see how that (...) (22 years ago, 5-Nov-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | | |
