Subject:
|
Re: We should create a 973c01.dat
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Sun, 27 Oct 2002 22:31:25 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
526 times
|
| |
|
|
I was just studying the minifig hips shortcut and had a thought. Would it
have been a good idea or not to use a subfile for the "studs" on minifig
hips? The question is really what justifies a subfile?
I'm slowly making my bounding box code smarter, and first teaching it that
studs are meant to go inside other pieces, so minifig hips are a bit of a
problem because they have no real studs.
-Erik
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: We should create a 973c01.dat
|
| (...) Hmm. It might make sense to make a stud primitive for the minifig hips studs. But probably not a subfile. OTOH, there's only one part that uses the minifig-hip-stud. So a primitive is not really justified. (...) Ah. Yes, I could see how that (...) (22 years ago, 5-Nov-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
Message is in Reply To:
6 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
