Subject:
|
Re: Eyeballing It
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Mon, 13 May 2002 18:27:17 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
436 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Steve Bliss writes:
> In lugnet.cad, Richard Marchetti writes:
> > BTW, I do really need an answer because I am taking baby steps towards
> > writing a parts authoring set of tutorials. Never fear, I am trying to
> > tackle only the easy stuff -- printed elements mainly.
>
> For flat printed elements, it's usually easy enough to scan the image, and
> overlay it with a grid. So you don't have to do as much eyeballing.
I haven't provided Richard with all of the preliminary stuff for that part
yet- there's a good bit of paperwork I did to work up the "correct" points.
And after that, he went and tweaked the geometry. Arrggh!!
--
Tony Hafner
www.hafhead.com
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Eyeballing It
|
| (...) The short answer is: well, yeah. I typically only use other pieces to measure parts. Having at least two of the part your modeling is very useful -- you can check different sections against each other, to see how they compare. (...) For flat (...) (22 years ago, 11-May-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
