Subject:
|
Re: Modeling String
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Wed, 10 Apr 2002 07:28:03 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
421 times
|
| |
|
|
"Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com> writes:
> Is cad.dat a better place to discuss?
Nah, the .dat.* groups are for posting .DAT content and followup
discussions. If you are going to post an example string element, the
.dat.parts would probably be a good choice.
Fredrik
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Modeling String
|
| (...) Well I just slapped together a primitive to simulate twisted string bits but am not all that pleased with it. The string I have in mind to model will be so tight that a straight line will be fine, no need for catenary curves (although it sure (...) (23 years ago, 10-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
9 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
