Subject:
|
Re: LDraw.org MOTM/SOTM voting for March is open
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Fri, 15 Mar 2002 11:04:13 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
517 times
|
| |
|
|
Paul Gyugyi wrote:
> Your R/W Complexity model looks very interesting.
> Was there some automated tools at work to generate it?
Yes. Do you want the source code? I will only write proper
documentation if somebody votes for the model. ;-)
> I've often thought of doing a tool that starts with a big
> cube of 1x1 plates and removes all but the ones inside
> a closed mesh. It would be really cool if you've done that.
That's more or less what I have done. The problem is to
automate the replacement of 1x1 plates with larger pieces in
a sensible way.
Play well,
Jacob
--
"Preserve wildlife, pickle a duck."
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: LDraw.org MOTM/SOTM voting for March is open
|
| (...) This sounds quite a bit like the subject of my major thesis. One way to go is probably to set up some kind of measure which credits the use of large pieces, and then run a Markov Chain Monte Carlo method to reach some (local) optimum. This (...) (23 years ago, 15-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: LDraw.org MOTM/SOTM voting for March is open
|
| Your R/W Complexity model looks very interesting. Was there some automated tools at work to generate it? (I award bonus points when voting for good use of tools). I've often thought of doing a tool that starts with a big cube of 1x1 plates and (...) (23 years ago, 8-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
